Yup! That's the only way to get these "tiny" engines to move today's cars-which are made of Reynolds wrapIt all goes to efficiency in terms of maximizing fuel economy while not adversely impacting performance. Every engine has a place in its power band where it can most efficiently do its best work (so to speak) for any given demand and set of operating and environmental conditions. The job of modern power-train control systems is to manage the transmission and engine controls from a total integrated system perspective that can be fine tuned/optimized on continual basis to produce the best balance of performance, economy, and component longevity/system reliability.
More gears to choose from offers the system more flexibility to optimally match gear ratios with engine capabilities within the priorities established in the control laws/algorithms consistent with operator inputs demand. This is why well-designed CVT style transmissions can produce very impressive performance and economy with small power plants. They essentially get to have virtually any ratio at any time to best match engine performance at a given RPM consistent with operator demand.
Believe it or not some over the road diesel truck designs I've seen (which may be in production, not sure) actually have adaptive control logic that essentially anticipates road conditions (e.g. steep inclines) via GPS and adjusts in advance to ensure the truck has optimized it's power-train settings for the specific road (altitude and grade) as well as the prevailing environmental conditions and driver inputs. There is a good case to be made for utilizing complex control logic to optimize system performance when it's easily within current capability...and this leads to having systems with lots of "gear choices" and the ability to adjust or re-tune the engine multiple times a second.
FWIW, I still like having a Chevy big block with a Rochester Quadrajet sitting on top all backed up by a TH400...but those days are history!

