• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

GHS Pressurewound--going thumpy expected?

Thanks, everyone for confirming this isn’t something that just happens and “everybody knows that but you”. :roflmao:

Like I said up top, they were great sounding until this happened. I’ll definitely try them again, and not move them this time. I did send a message to GHS, and did say I moved them—fair is fair. I’ll report on what they reply.
 
Strings go dead because organic material collects along the tiny spaces in the windings. This is why flats don’t exactly die like rounds do - less space for hand gak to hide.

Maybe you handled them a lot while you switched them or you happened to do it with something greasy on your hands. If so you could soak them in denatured alcohol for a couple days and they will sound close to new.

I suppose you might have twisted them when you put them on the Yamaha, but seems unlikely you’d have done that with all the strings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SharpCat
1st not every bass will like every string. My 76 Ric loves GHS boomers, but my 2015 hates them. So I put the Pressure wounds on my 2015 Ric and my Jag (customized Squire). I have had them on the Jag for almost 2 years. I decided to do a video (not done editing it) with HD sound to compare the old to the new. Surprisingly they sound almost exactly the same. I assumed they were getting old (they looked old) and needed changing, nope. The Ric brighter but that's the PUs. Right now for those two basses it's my favorite string.
 
This sounds either like a bad set of strings or maybe that they didn't like being changed from one bass to another. I've had a set of these on a 5 string Fender Jazz for (tries to do math)... a number of years now, and they sound pretty much like they did a month after I strung the bass with them. YMMV, but I think they're a killer product - can dial in a bit of brightness with EQ and digging in, or can go totally warm and round like flats as needed, generally just with finger placement and intonation.
 
Would you say that the clank is a main part of their sound or something that goes away after a period of time?

I guess it depends on your definition of "clank". They're not "zingy" (except when they're brand new) but they have a very strong mid presence. The "clankier" upper mids will mellow out a bit over time but these strings will always be all about the mids. For this reason I didn't like them at all on P-basses, too much mids. I like them a lot more with J-bass neck pickups. At least tonally.

The "feel" or dynamic response isn't quite right for my style of playing though. I generally prefer strings with a "bouncier" attack and a livelier dynamic response. Pressurewounds have a very controlled attack and long sustain. To me they feel kinda like playing through a compressor set for a very fast attack and a slow release. I find them slightly unresponsive when playing softly and a the same time I feel like they're holding me back when digging in hard. I guess they feel less articulate to me than many other strings. But if you want controlled dynamics, good sustain and a strong mid presence they could be the perfect choice.

They are good quality strings and lots of people love them. There's just something about them that doesn't quite work for me. But I generally find "half round"-strings to be the "worst of both worlds". The only exception would be the Roto 55 but they don't really feel like half-rounds at all. They're practically roundwounds and VERY similar to the Roto 66s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SharpCat and Selim
An interesting impression, thanks.

I’ve had a 44-106 set on a jazz bass for a few weeks now. Overall, I like most every aspect of them except for this clank (or maybe the “crunch” described by Michael T here). Now that they’ve had more time to settle in, I now see that this clank thing (or the remnants of it) depends on how hard you play them. I play with a light touch now although I played harder for decades probably because I was coming from playing DB.

I hear you on the compression analogy — I agree that these strings do that, in the same way that I think flats do it — but I like it (as long as they don’t overdo it, which I don’t think they do). I play rhythm based music (I know, all music is rhythmic…) where the bass is more like a melodic drum, so the compression effect works. Other strings “jump out” more but I think these strings with their strong mids and tight low end and this mild compression effect sit very well in a mix. But I do think that those mids are more what we call “textured” as opposed to what I might call the “harmonically rich” mids of DR nickel lo riders (the only other round wound string I use). And as in the old saying, “the music is in the midrange. Sometimes I miss that liveliness that the lo riders bring.

Also — the usual disclaimer applies here — results vary. There are other variables at work: the bass, what kind of pickups, etc. I like other strings more on my other basses, but on a very nice modded 90s Fernandes jazz w Alleva Coppolo pickups and preamp, the pressures work.
 
I do think that those mids are more what we call “textured” as opposed to what I might call the “harmonically rich” mids of DR nickel lo riders (the only other round wound string I use). And as in the old saying, “the music is in the midrange. Sometimes I miss that liveliness that the lo riders bring.

This is an excellent way to compare PWs and NLRs. This "textured" mid character of PWs can get a little "messy" on some basses. For example, PWs have always sounded better on my Jazz (naturally scooped with both pickups full on) than on my Precision (naturally mid-forward). I would prefer NLRs for my Precision with their smoother but "harmonically rich" mids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Selim and SharpCat