Thanks for all the replies! I know it sounds ridiculous, but I've previously owned a Markbass LMT800, and that didn't come close to the volume on the GK!
As far as the cabinets go, the 410 alone is just too thin for what I need. Don't get me wrong, it's a beautiful sounding cabinet, but I'm using it in a band that primarily covers the Grateful Dead! I like the way the 115 rounds out the 410, but I'm well aware of the 410 surpassing the 115 in volume. That's why I'd hoped that the 212 might be a nice compromise. Plus, a higher RMS adds peace of mind.
I might have to give that a go. God forbid it ever lost power or got stepped on by accident. My cabinets would explode!
Like I said, I know it sounds ridiculous, so I appreciate your suggestions![/QUOTE
We may have been separated at birth. I played the same SVT cabs and had the same LMT800 and it was utter shock in a good way at the sonic difference when I switched to the GKMB 800. 2 things coming from Mark bass Land to GK.1. THE GAIN CONTROL, THE GAIN CONTROL, THE GAIN CONTROL....... I hear ya, a little tuff to dial to your own personal touch but worth the fight. 2.GET THE CAB OFF THE FLOOR. Don't take much , caster s or dolley goes a long way in reducing the Boom Boom in the room . I am saving my sheckles for the GK 212 also. More mid focused, and I was able to demo one, great cab but as stated may not be what u want. The Ampegs are glorious and if u can handle moving them. I would stick with them. DONT DOWNSIZE THE HEAD, Headroom is the key Grasshopper!