• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Has anyone seen the movie Zeitgeist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 79588
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
#81
Philbiker said:
No, I called the argument you are putting forth stupid. Because it is. Unfortunately, many smart people who should know better get caught up in stupid stuff. Look how many people thought that the insane home valuations of the last decade were sustainable for a good example.Good luck with that.
Click to expand...

geez, i'm trying to get out of here, but i can't...

does that mean you're stupid for getting caught up in this thread?...

I'm having and have had "good luck" my whole life with "seeing is believing"
that's why I never got caught in the "home valuations" crap, and I live in Vegas, saw it it coming way before it happened...

to Visirale,
I'm not insinuating that at all...plus I never said anyone should be buying into anything, If you look back, I to believe Zeitgeist is full of holes.
I'm merely pointing out another one sided, biased group of people on this Earth
which confirms the irony in all of this...

I meant no offense to you Philbiker :)
 
#82
Regarding 9/11 and JFK, I don't think a critical thinker can accept the official explanations as such. There was nothing to them that we weren't told about? This leads to legitimate speculation.
 
#84
cdef said:
Regarding 9/11 and JFK, I don't think a critical thinker can accept the official explanations as such. There was nothing to them that we weren't told about? This leads to legitimate speculation.
Click to expand...
There is no way any critical thinker who does honest research can have anything but disdain for the conspiracy theories in these cases.

There is not a single serious academic historian who gives either of these nutty theories the time of day. That should tell you something (hint: it does not tell you that historians are in on it).
 
#86
BobXboB said:
OK, 1 person can see it. Anyone else? :)

And I still thing using name calling to win an argument is just a sign of being afraid and scared. Ironically those who created 9-11 were also afraid and scared and used a lot of name calling.
Click to expand...
I see no irony. I see people, including myself, reacting with disbelief, frustration and mockery at those who insist on attempting to propagate massive conspiracy theories that have been debunked over and over again, theories that defy logic. The information is out there, yet you refuse to accept it.

Eventually, when someone repeatedly keeps yelling "2+2=5" in front of an audience, they lose the right to a calm, patient explanation/reaction.
 
#88
Philbiker said:
There is no way any critical thinker who does honest research can have anything but disdain for the conspiracy theories in these cases. ...
Click to expand...

Well, as regards 9/11, I've done what I consider honest research, and am still waiting for an explanation of how the ever-alert NORAD air command could have failed so totally on that very day. Also, there are testimonies that put Cheney's doings in question. I do consider these things worthy of speculation. Not that I subscribe to NWO conspiracies, but it's naive to think that things just "happen".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back