• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headless basses

Love them or hate them.

They do have a lot of plus points, easier stringing, great balance etc.

Post your pictures, I'm particularly interested in seeing spme headless single cut basses.

I'm about to order a new Sei 6 string, single cut. My current 6string is a headless Sei flambouyant, and I'm almost certainly going to go headless on the new one.

Here's mine to start.
 

Attachments

  • seiflam6hl.jpg
    seiflam6hl.jpg
    54.6 KB · Views: 117
Here is what may be (or may be a replica) of what Jonas Hellborg was playing back in the 80's

schack1.jpg


And while not a "true" headless, it does the job for me...my Kubicki! Sorry it's not the best picture, I could post better ones but they're huge!

kubicki0181.jpg
 
dunamis said:
My main bass for the past 8 months or so-- Zon "Vinny" VB5.:cool:

Those Zon Vinnys are fantastic looking. I'd love to give one a try some day.

Here's some "old school" headless for you, built in 1988, plays exactly like it did when I bought it:

IMG_0647.jpg


(My XL-2 will always be my most treasured bass, even above my Sadowsky -- we've just been through too much together.)
 
bassplayer2106 said:
.....They do have a lot of plus points, easier stringing, great balance etc.......


.. Yes, they have many advantages; for example, the Steinberger XL2 has the advantage of being FAR superior to every bass ever made in terms of tone, tuning stability, balance, versatility, etc.


...and a couple of disadvantages; for example, the XL2 is no longer in production, so parts are difficult to come by; and also, the 5-string XL2 had too narrow a string spacing

..though if the current XQ series Steinberger is decent, that'll have decent string spacing PLUS available parts (not that there's a whole lotta demand for Steinberger parts, coz rarely IME do things need replacing



..IMHO + IME + FWIW


.
 
Chris2112 said:
Here is what may be (or may be a replica) of what Jonas Hellborg was playing back in the 80's

schack1.jpg


And while not a "true" headless, it does the job for me...my Kubicki! Sorry it's not the best picture, I could post better ones but they're huge!

kubicki0181.jpg


The Schack that Jonas Hellborg played looked amazing didn't it, so cool, to me anyway.

I like the whole headless thing, they just look so different.

The tuning thing that someone asked about, they so easy to tune, especially meid song, you just reach to the bottom of the bass. Also the tuners are very sensitive, making for very accurate tuning. There's also the benefit of it not going out of tune during transportation, the tuners don't get knocked.

The best thing though, besided the visual appeal, is the balance.
Most headed basses are head heavy, to some degree or another, you may not notice, you get accustomed to it.
My Sei 5 is slightly, but I didn't really notice untill I got the 6, it just sits in the perfect place, you can angle it anywhere when strapped on, and it just sits there, the balance is so perfect.
 
Rocinante_x1 said:
Wouldnt headless basses be a PITA to tune? i dunno... i kina like the headstock look on a bass.

No, why would they be?

And Zooberwerx, I dig that Stealth! :D

And yes, on the balance issue, they're wonderful! I can play my Kubicki for hours because it's so well designed, it's a light as a feather, especially when it's strapped on. It's akin to holding a Stratocsater!