• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headless Zon

Thanks, guys. I agree with all of the advantages described above. Another I’ll mention is that the headless tuning system allows the string to be pulled straight back as opposed to being twisted, which can cause some problems in the string’s performance, I think. All in all, I find the “headless” design to be preferable.
 
Perfect timing, guys! I've got a line on a 2005 (or earlier) Vinny 5, set-neck, no truss rod. I understand the newer models sport bolt-on necks with some type of relief adjustment. Any preferences betweenst the two or issues of which I should be aware? I'd hate to have a non-adjustable neck go haywire on me.

Thanks

Riis
 
I have a Zon with no adjustment rod and one with, and I've never touched either. I play with an ultra-straight neck as I'm really finicky about the setup, so I end up doing adjustments to my wood necked basses every few days to keep it dead straight. I've never had to touch the Zons, ever. You shouldn't have any issues.
 
Of all the basses I own by Rickenbacker, Rick Turner, Zon, Fender, Höfner and Yamaha, the only one with absolutely no dead spots is the Yamaha, a relatively inexpensive BX-1, which happens to be the only one that is a headless design! The Zon is close but does have a bit of deadness at the 11 fret position (fretless Sonus 5/1) on the G string, plus, the 5 fret position harmonic does not ring very true on the same string, especially when I hit it and then slide up the string while pushing down on the fingerboard, as it is usually done. The other fretless Zon I used to have, a Sonus Special 5, did not have these issues; perhaps it may partly be due to the 5/1 having a matt finish vs. the Special's glossy finish on the fingerboard, but I doubt that is the reason. :hmm: