• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Headless?

I picked up a Washburn Bantam in about 1980. It's a wooden Steinberger copy, with Steinberger licensed hardware. Eventually I ditched the pups and put in active EMG's and a BTC pre. It's great for slap. That bass also has absolutely rock solid intonation. I play stuff up past the 12th and it's perfectly in tune.

I just broke it out last week for some practicing - my Roscoe was in for a tuneup. Neat little bass.
I remember them! They weren't bad. You did the right thing with the pickups. I would have done it if I weren't so cheap. The repair guy I take my basses to had an old set of Model J's he let me have for $40.
 
I have an 86 xp2 Steinberger with the original composite neck, made a new mahogany body for it. As others have said, the straight line pull of the bridge tuners, like drawing a bowstring, is much more stable than traditional tuners, and the graphite neck is nearly impervious to climate or temperature change. It feels and plays exactly the same every time I pick it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maestrovert
I am toying with the idea of having a custom rail made from scratch in ether a Chestnut or KOA short scale and a plain ebony fretless board

sykwpc.jpg
 
Im playing a fretted NS radius cr5 that I got a couple of months ago. It's my first headless, first 35in scale, first piezo equipped bass, first (to me) boutique-level bass.... a lot of firsts. so far I'm loving it. it has a nice bump out on the back of the neck to give an idea of where the headstock should be so I never feel lost. BONUS: it can handle any normal long-scale string - no need for double ball strings!
 
  • Like
Reactions: maestrovert
IMHO headless simply makes more sense. There are fewer balance issues since the center of gravity is not "pulled" distally by the tuners and extra wood of a headstock, and my Michel Fournel 5 easily fits in the standard overhead bin when I fly, a huge plus for me. Since most modern headless basses no longer require double ball strings, the only potential downside is the lack of a "classic" look, which doesn't matter to me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: maestrovert
I've been playing headless since the late 80's with Status basses. The weight distribution is perfect, with the added bonus of giving you more LH freedom, as you're not supporting the weight of a diving neck (in some badly designed instances!) But at the end of the day, it's all down to personal preferences. Yes, I own headed basses too, but headless is just perfect for me. It's not about trends or aesthetics, but practicality and playability. Here's one of my main players...

ImageUploadedByTalkBass1405365681.195297.jpg
ImageUploadedByTalkBass1405365699.844601.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: maestrovert
I've built my first headless not too long ago. I think it's nice to have a shorter instrument but the feel is different. I think one of the reasons of the pretty narrow choice is that ABM and ETS charge a small fortune for their headless units. Next time I'm going to make it by myself but I wanted to have something for future comparison.SAM_6292.JPG
 
Couldn't agree more OTPJ.
I've been playing headless since the late 80's with Status basses. The weight distribution is perfect, with the added bonus of giving you more LH freedom, as you're not supporting the weight of a diving neck (in some badly designed instances!) But at the end of the day, it's all down to personal preferences. Yes, I own headed basses too, but headless is just perfect for me. It's not about trends or aesthetics, but practicality and playability. Here's one of my main players...

View attachment 446809View attachment 446810
Status and Steinbergers for me.
20140702_145152_zps6e0aca81.jpg

KubickiL2002_zps61579082.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: maestrovert
This is the one I let go. Twice. And now I'd love to get ahold of another, this time not let it go. Westone Super Headless. Took regular strings, no double ball necessary. Bought the first one off my aunt in 95 for $250, she bought it new for $1000 in 87. Sold it in 2001 or 2002. Wanted another, bought the same thing off ebay in 2004. Sold it in 2007, and want another, again.


superheadless1.jpg
 
Roscoe is offering a headless bass now. It is about the same length as a stratocaster, Roscoe also has a small padded bag and best of all it will fit nicely in the overhead bin of an airplane.

That will be on my wish list. I know MPG had made one of his basses in a headless and had a pic of it on his site but kept it as his personal player. My dream bass would be a headless Warrior.
 
Still loving my 92 XL2A fretless n my 96 XL25W lefties, along with my Hohner 5 but wish I hadn't sold my XZ Spirit 5 as that was a really nice bass to play, especially with the real EMG pups n the EMG BT2 preamp I put in it aftermarket. Ultra rare in lefty these days since they canned production, hence the Wilkat interest.