Greg Clinkingbeard
Commercial User
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Ric - I don't own a DPA. I borrowed one for review, but didn't buy it, as the PJB amp is not mic-friendly, and my laziness regarding gig schlep is currently greater than my zeal for "the perfect sound".
Just what I needed to bring me down to reality. Thanks.
Ric - I don't own a DPA. I borrowed one for review, but didn't buy it, as the PJB amp is not mic-friendly, and my laziness regarding gig schlep is currently greater than my zeal for "the perfect sound".
The reality didn't last. Won't know for a few gigs but running into the aux input of the GK the tone is much fatter than the GK pre. There is a three dimensional quality to it that sounds more like a good mic than just a pickup. I can seen the notch filter being used in some rooms. I tried it with an AI Ten2 combo and thought it sounded at least as good as the AI pre.
I will update in a week or so.
Yes,
Phantom power is there but it's low. I've used it successfully with the Audio Technica ATM 35 mic. The volume is much lower than my Full Circle but it is adequate and with separate gain for each channel it works fine.
Do a search or just take the time to read the entire thread. There is some discussion about the phantom power issue. It is a great preamp.
My review of the EDB-1 on my '42 Kay with a Fishman Full Circle Pickup. I love mine! http://basstony.wordpress.com/2012/...guitar-player-it-has-got-to-be-headway-edb-1/
I agree with you on the BP-100(The BP is not even comparable to the Full-Circle if you haven't tried it out yet), I wouldn't discount the pre-amp, when a better purchase would be a higher end pickup. I had the K&K bass master stereo pickup and pre but it really wasn't the sound I wanted, so when I dove in and purchased the Full Circle I was pleased, but because of my SWR Natural blonde I needed to cut the lows out in a big way. The BP is not even comparable to the Full-Circle if you haven't tried it out yet. The EDB-1 was perfect for that. I will admit that the gain is high and didn't know that was the reason, and I appreciate you sharing! I barely turn my gain up! That is also interesting about the DPA, I have tried one but found that I couldn't use it live because it would feed back instantly at very low volumes. Figured it wasn't meant for club use(any advice?)-I also didn't try it out with a pre amp... just the EQ from my natural blonde. How did you get your Walter Woods? I have never heard them, thought you might enjoy this Link RemovedP Brown,
If you take a look at Paulitto's post, he's using a Fishman BP-100 pickup. IME, IMHO it's my least favorite pickup. It mutes the bridge with felt padded brass clips, demands a 10 meg input impedance, and has a tonal quality that I found emphasized the wrong midrange frequencies.
I own a Headway EDB-1 and if you're willing to put up with it's little inconsistencies, then it can be a great little box.
Since the input gain structure on Channel 1 is so hot, it really wasn't a good match with my older Realist Pickup (copper foil version). My solution was to send the unit back to Headway and have their technician modify Channel 1, lowering it to unity gain. Once that was done, the Realist's output wasn't an issue anymore. David Gage's solution, was to provide a attenuated Planet Waves cable that lowers the Realist's output, and solves this problem without having to do any modification on the circuitry of the EDB-1. The modification can be reversed, but, the charges for sending it back and forth to Headway, make it very expensive to do more than once.
Blending the Realist with a DPA 4099 worked well, but since the DPA requires 48 volts phantom power and the Headway only provides 18 volts, there is a noticeable hiss that is audible, it tends to disappear in the mix, but it's nonetheless there.
Using either of my Walter Woods amplifiers, the Pre Amp section of the Headway boosts the signal so much that it's better just to send it's signal directly into their power amp sections, bypassing the Woods' pre amps. Having to EQ the Woods to compensate for the Headway just wasn't practical. From what I gather it really works best into a powered speaker like a QSC K10.
Ric
P.S. I guess, for me at least, having to purchase a new power amp, or powered speaker, just doesn't offset the Headway's feature set. The added cost of modifying the box, or purchasing a cable to use the Realist may also be a consideration.
I agree with you on the BP-100(The BP is not even comparable to the Full-Circle if you haven't tried it out yet), I wouldn't discount the pre-amp, when a better purchase would be a higher end pickup....
I
...because of my SWR Natural blonde I needed to cut the lows out in a big way. The BP is not even comparable to the Full-Circle if you haven't tried it out yet.
I
The EDB-1 was perfect for that. I will admit that the gain is high and didn't know that was the reason, and I appreciate you sharing! I barely turn my gain up!
I
That is also interesting about the DPA, I have tried one but found that I couldn't use it live because it would feed back instantly at very low volumes. Figured it wasn't meant for club use(any advice?)-I also didn't try it out with a pre amp... just the EQ from my natural blonde.
I
How did you get your Walter Woods? I have never heard them, thought you might enjoy this Link Removed
Thanks for your knowledge! P
i wanted to give this thread a little updade. im someone who does not like the headway sound for live use, but i recently just bought a mic preamp for home recording, the golden age one, and for home recording, the headway sounds way better. im using a dynamic mic. havent compared condensers yet, but the headway doesnt provide the 48v that the golden age provides, so im not sure if that will make a sound difference.