you must be getting used because I'm pretty sure not a single one on that list is under $1000 new
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
you must be getting used because I'm pretty sure not a single one on that list is under $1000 new
The single thing I dislike about the Stingray is that on 4-string models, the G string has a weaker output than the others. Awesome tone though.
If the $$ is what you want, go for it.
The SR 600/700/750 and Prestige 1000 are great basses, but the MM and 1200e are much, much better. I haven't played the $$. Warwick bodies and necks never suited me, but the build quality on the instruments I've played were flawless.
The 1200e looks amazing in person, and the Nords are brilliant. The range of tones you could get from them was amazing. I also love thin necks - This is the bass I'd personally get.
You haven't tried the double buck but it's your fav. bass of all time? Try it out first!
Ya I have always loved the MM tone, but I have a SUB so I don't want to drop money and the oppurtunity at a different bass if they are going to be too similar.
But thanks for the info on the SR1200e. The bass just looks so great and has everything I have been looking for. But the $$ is also fantastic, making this a hard decision.
Warwicks are polarising instruments. Is there any reason you can't play it before you purchase it? IMO, that would be the way to go when choosing between these instruments.
If you already have a SUB, think of it as a substitue Musicman. I had a Ray35, And I didn't really feel like ponying up the cash for a real EBMM. When I A/B'd it, there wasn't much difference. I didn't notice anything that made me put down the Ray35. That said, some people on this forum HAVE. If you were looking at a Bongo/Big Al, then It'd be a different story, they are completely different.