TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I will up the other guy’s previous offer of a nickle,and add a chicken sandwich!Well Sam is right FYI, the pickup cover is definitely magnetic cause my screwdriver top stuck to it. Am i supposed to charge it or something?
Hm i see what you mean now. This bad boy has a little bit of curvature on the end, but this is definitely intended from factory cause there is absolutely no wear or tear of any sort. I'm confused, I wish luthiers worked in NYC right now...
Throw in a nice bottle of mt dew and you got yourself a deal partnerI will up the other guy’s previous offer of a nickle,and add a chicken sandwich!![]()

Maybe It’s possible this is a 4003 that someone converted...?Hm i see what you mean now. This bad boy has a little bit of curvature on the end, but this is definitely intended from factory cause there is absolutely no wear or tear of any sort. I'm confused, I wish luthiers worked in NYC right now...
The dude i got it from told me it's a 4003S like the one McCartney used. I never even saw a rickenbacker in my life before so i truly have no idea what's up with this oneMaybe It’s possible this is a 4003 that someone converted...?
If so, they still wound up with an a nice reproduction of a ‘60s Rickbass.
Rickenbacker 4001 V63 bass guitar 1984 1985 early production | Get B.C. Rich or die trying | ReverbMaybe It’s possible this is a 4003 that someone converted...?
If so, they still wound up with an a nice reproduction of a ‘60s Rickbass.
Rickenbacker has been known to do that sort of thing. I owned a ‘92 V63 once,and I didn’t care much for that square heel.Well i did my research and found pictures of 3 Rickenbacker 4001 V63 basses on google. All of them have a heel exactly like this one so my assumption is that they changed the design as their model changed over time
I truly don't know bud. Here's the pics for you, but my knowledge is not helpful with thisHow about a close up of the front and back of the headstock. Does yours have the long headstock?
Speaking of which i love their headstock design, I think it's one of the coolest ones i saw thus farHow about a close up of the front and back of the headstock. Does yours have the long headstock?
http://www.rickenbacker.com/pdfs/manual.pdfUnfortunately neither of mine came with recommendations to read .
Which further means...? Sorry, I can't overstate how little i know about this brandYes, that's a long headstock.
All the AC’s are single rod as are some of the special run dealer specials but I forget which ones specifically.The original AC was single-rod, but I think the prod models are twin.
My 5-string is twin truss-rod.
I think it's a distinguishing feature of the bass and it can give a bit of tweakability.
Except that it doesn’t actually work. What you end up with is a neck where the bulk of the load is carried by one rod while the other is doing little to nothing. If you were successful in putting more relief in one side of the neck than the other, the neck would eventually twist.It is true actually, because if you adjust the neck-relief to 0.2 mm on the bass-side of the neck & the relief on the treble-side is 0.3 mm on a single truss-rod bass, there's nothing you can do.
On a RIC you can adjust each side.
Uh that's quite sexy to me, the binding and everything! What a gorgeous beast!