I sold an Ibanez to buy a Warwick. Any questions?
I've sold 5 Ibbys to buy 2 Warwicks, and after a few years playing it, I decided to buy abother 2...Ibbys
All these were brand new instruments, one W was CS. IMO the Ibanez managed to maintain an astonishing price/value ratio, while the Warwick brand cares nowadays more about the money and less about the customer - sorry, but I'm not buying all that "it's a family" advertising crap. Their instruments are now IMO overpriced: they're good basses, but nothing really spectacular. And their CS prices are ridiculous - I mean 500$ for some fancy fretboard inlays? Give me a break
!Anyway, back on topic: a Rockbass is not a Warwick. I know they're trying to add them as "real Chinese Warwicks", but they're not even close to the real deal. Of course this doesn't mean they're bad, quite the opposite. But if you're after the authentic W sound, then get a real Warwick.
Ibanez basses on the other hand have a horrid resale value, but they're very good basses for the money. Their mid priced basses are better than most of the other brand basses in the same price range. The Prestige are IMO overpriced, but the new Premium line is simply put awesome.
I'd go for the Ibby because I've learned the hard way the extra money you're paying for a W will not always get you a 100% better bass (my Ibby SRT is quite on par with my W Thumb, in spite of being almost 1k$ cheaper) - but that's just me.
My advice is to personally play both basses and pick the one you like the most - regardledd of the name on the headstock. Good luck!