Active or passive?
Doesn't matter, the plunging is in the fingers. There is no such thing as tone-ceramic.
Enjoy the benefits of a premium membership!
Upgrade Account
-
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Hobbyists -vs- Real Musicians?
- Thread starter MultiScaleMale
- Start date
Doesn't matter, the plunging is in the fingers. There is no such thing as tone-ceramic.
Sorry folks but musician is a profession. Playing music regardless of pay makes you a hobbyist.
I saw Alice Cooper throw up in the back of a VW bus after a gig on the way to a nightclub. P.S. he got too drunk and ate too much pizza backstage. 
I regret to inform that I cannot make it to this year's Thanksgiving feast.Just because you put a booger in a pie, doesn't make it a booger pie.
You are now a hobby-journalist.I saw Alice Cooper throw up in the back of a VW bus after a gig on the way to a nightclub. P.S. he got too drunk and ate too much pizza backstage.
Playing music--regardless of pay--makes you a musician. Getting paid to play music makes you a professional musician.
If I can prepare a few dishes in the kitchen that does not make me a cook. It simply means I can prepare a few dishes.
I've done the whole pro touring, session player, to cheesy cover gigs at $250-$350 per. It is in fact wholly different than being an original artist. Its almost like acting. Unfortunately, talent and opportunity don't go hand and hand. Bassists on a mediocre level that make the same money playing covers calling themselves "pro" made me see things differently. Technically the "pro" definition is correct, but its in regards to the superficial side of things
So to be clear: you don't consider people who don't get paid worthy of the designation 'musician,' is that correct?
We're going to need the long gloves for this one.Get out the plunger.
So, Anton Chekhov was a doctor, not a playwright. Got it. I feel foolish, thinking he was generally considered among the greatest playwrights of all time. Silly me.
Anyone who plays music is a musician. Gigging doesn't make a person more of a musician than someone who plays only at home. It makes them a professional. Leaving the person who plays music at home being a hobbyist. The only difference is cash.... Nothing more, nothing less.
I guess I just see it differently. There was a point in my life where I was paid to make music. Much like others on here I would gig usually weekly. Today, my age and current career, which includes copious amounts of travel, make it too difficult to commit to a band. So was I a musician before, but I am not now?
Putting this in context, if someone asked me what I do? I would not say... "I am a musician." Like most of us, in that context, I would define myself by my primary occupation. (Which is a different discussion for a different day.)
If I’m being honest, I do think that some bassists are not really musicians. But it has nothing to do with money or how often they gig. It’s a mindset thing.
If you work at your craft, understand the larger context of how your instrument fits into the song, and always seek to improve your playing, you’re a musician to me. Put simply, being a musician is caring about the music.
If you don’t care at all, well, maybe not.
If you work at your craft, understand the larger context of how your instrument fits into the song, and always seek to improve your playing, you’re a musician to me. Put simply, being a musician is caring about the music.
If you don’t care at all, well, maybe not.
