• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Hobbyists -vs- Real Musicians?

Can't help but dig the irony of people committing time theft at their non-musical day job while arguing whether they're a musician.

Just sayin' in general, no need to respond lest ye doth protest too much.

The vast majority of "musicians" cant afford all this gear or to "talk" music all day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xroads64 and JRA
I play a lot of golf...I even make some money here and there...I surely am not a pro...Same with bass...I play in a cover band with a bunch of other dudes in their 50's...we make a little money...(key word being little)...point is I'm not a pro golfer or a pro musician...but I am a golfer...and I am a musician :)....no need to be so hard on ourselves...life is short.
 
Sure, but an amateur WHAT? An amateur... musician?

Nah. Professional musician is a profession. Says so right on the label.

I can hold my own on the bass. Even know a fair amount of theory. I've done a couple of hundred paid gigs in my "illustrious career". People, including my wife have referred to me as a musician and I'd be like, "nah, this is just my hobby".

Call yourself whatever you want. At the end of the day it means nothing.
 
Hobbyists -vs- Real Musicians
I'm not sure what this means. To me, anyone who can play a musical instrument with a degree of proficiency is a "real musician", even if they're not a full time professional musician. But then, what does "professional" mean? Is it that music is your main "pay the bills" income, or that you make more money from music than you spend on it, or just that you've been paid at least once for a gig?

I know a handful of professional musicians for whom it's their only job. Most of them don't earn very much from it; enough to pay rent, keep the lights on, put food on the table and gas in the car. Some of them are very well known by national standards but they'll never earn as much as I do in my office job. Most were in bands playing original material back in the 70s and 80s but they're pretty much all doing covers now, or backing guys who were singers in bands in the 70s and 80s, playing the songs the singer sang back then, so still covers from the guitarist/keyboard player/drummer's perspective.

I know a lot of hobbyists; I'd classify myself as one. People who gig once or twice a week, and make enough money to fund our hobby and a bit more, but it's not paying our bills. None of us are known as musicians outside of our circle of friends or a few interested patrons in the clubs and bars we play regularly. We're doctors, university lecturers, business analysts, human resources advisors, IT solutions architects... We're mostly in cover bands, but might play a few originals. Many of the guys I play with are better musicians than the full time pros I know. We do it because we love music and enjoy spending time with like minded individuals. And with no egos or dramas, etc. these guys are a lot more fun to play with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helix
This whole "pro" versus "non-pro" thing is also contentious. To me, I'd define "pros" as you're making your living (and paying taxes) off playing bass and I'd omit those that have the classic definition of success - a wife/girlfriend with a great job with benefits. If you're pulling in $75 / night, that's a hobby that takes a long time just to pay off a bass. I've seen a lot of people calling themselves "pros" and then when you dig deeper, they're retired and are playing every other Wednesday at Joe's bar and grill off Rt 32. But, hey, if calling yourself a pro makes you feel better, go for it.
I’ve wrestled with this myself. I was pro for many years - that’s how I earned my living. I realised along the way that in my old age I would need somewhere to settle and preferably not pay rent so I became semi-pro and worked during the day. Bank managers don’t give musicians a mortgage. Now I’m retired from day work and I still play but not always for money. I never stopped being a musician. I just changed the circumstances in which I played. A musician is someone who plays a musical instrument with proficiency. A professional musician is someone who does it for a living.
 
Last edited:
Musicians play music - simple as that. Mozart made lots of his money giving lessons to the King's court. Ron Carter gives bass lessons. Lots of great musicians struggling to pay rent or get jobs, and lots of people with not much but looks driving in limos.

Etc.
Seeing your avatar made this whole thread worth it for me.
 
TL;DR but liked anyways. ;)

No TL;DR -- an easy read.

I think if I am making good music, then I am a musician. It's not relative to anyone else and what they are doing. If I am getting paid to be a musician, I am a musician, even if by other people's standards my music isn't as good as they think it should be. These types of convos are like debates about whether jazz or p-bass is better, Fender or Squier, EUB or other kinds of basses, etcetera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bassbeater
I can hold my own on the bass. Even know a fair amount of theory. I've done a couple of hundred paid gigs in my "illustrious career". People, including my wife have referred to me as a musician and I'd be like, "nah, this is just my hobby".

Call yourself whatever you want. At the end of the day it means nothing.
It means nothing to you , which is fair enough. The words being discussed actually do have meanings. You appear to be a semi-professional musician. Call yourself whatever you want, at the end of the day you're still a semi-pro musician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lowbrow
I can hold my own on the bass. Even know a fair amount of theory. I've done a couple of hundred paid gigs in my "illustrious career". People, including my wife have referred to me as a musician and I'd be like, "nah, this is just my hobby".

Call yourself whatever you want. At the end of the day it means nothing.
And this whole time I thought I was reading the opinion of a pro who judged others not worthy. Rather, we were seeing a self-assessment projected outward.