While at the shop today, I recessed the body for the 3 neck-attachment collars and installed 3 steel mollies for machine-bolts for the bridge. I did this on my Coral for a more dynamic bridge interface. The vintage Dano bridge is basically attached by 1 screw, and it rests on two screws for height adjustments. Having them be a more solid, easily adjustable system (via machine-bolts and inset metal mollies) is a big improvement. I need to get 3 appropriate length bolts for it - and will post pics once I do. I like how simple/basic the original Dan bridge was, but with equally simple up-grades - it is even better.
This peripherally brings up the long debated concern about bridges. One camp is more about minimal, the other maximal. In my builds, I have incorporated both and (for me) the verdict is still out. The Dano system is one of the most minimal out there - and yet, it works. Because of this, I can't confirm superiority of one over the other having done both. In the most common applications - it's basic Fender-style bent-plate vs "high mass" bridges. I can see advantages/disadvantages of both - but regardless... they both work. Maybe I don't have the super-ear to dicern such nuance - but to a "players" ear - I have yet to hear one version that is FAR superior to the rest enough to say - this is THEE way.