Unless we are all wealthy (I am not), how come all of do not play Carvin? It would seem to make sense if you are willing to pay $3000 for a Sadowsky (or fill in "Sadowsky" with any other boutique co.) that we would be willing to pay half of that for something that is arguably equal or better.
I once wasted the better part of an entire weekend "virtual building" their basses. Whenever the final price appeared on the screen my jaw would drop because I couldn't believe how low the price is. Then I go thinking, if thats the case, how come all of us dont have one (or more).
And in other scenario's, it's even more obvious. If you are willing to pay say $1200 for a Korean made Zon, than you would be willing to pay $950 for a US made Carvin with better options, right?
Just a thought.
A great point, also of note is the fact that Carvin is strictly mail order and cannot afford negative 'word of mouth', basically they have to make decent products or the afore mentioned word of mouth would have sunk them long ago, I've never owned a Carvin bass however have heard some decent tones comming from both guitar and basses over the years...as far as Bass equipment I'm quite pleased with my Carvin BX-1200 -when I was shopping for a new amp I had a limited budget of around $1200, I tried many different products and liked nearly all of them however nothing could match the Carvins power and tonal options -now I understand 'tone' is extremely subjective however with this product I can pretty much dial up any tone I want plus it's been very reliable (especially considering how it's used in 'bridged' mode at 4 ohms). The fact that I paid far less then $1000 for this head just adds to the overall value.

