After seeing the video, I'll stick with "equal pay". Everyone brings something to the band and you guys sound good. You're doing backup vocals on the stuff that he can't hit.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Yes. I want to ride that "perceived value" to the top of the pay scale if the paying public thinks that "perceived value" is worth opening their wallet for. I understand why the Star makes more money than me.
Equal pay, if you feel that he's the stand out then everyone else should up their game and make the band even better.
It's just an example. Level has nothing to do with it. My real job is chemical sales. There are 5 other guys with the same job at the company but I doubt we all make the same. I'm also pretty sure I make more than the delivery guy even though he does more heavy lifting and is better looking.Obviously the OP doesn't have what would be called a Pro-Sports level band.
Contracts? Bonuses? Endorsement Deals? TV income stream? Individual Managers/Agents?
Most likely not.
They would say, "Why do I need to pay a band? I can get a Karioki machine for $500."I wonder what the response to this would have been if I'd posted the question on the "talk-singer" forum. LOL
Equal cut. Always the safest![]()
And yet...I appreciate all of the constructive feedback and comments guys. Seems there's a clear consensus of opinion on this topic.

It's just an example. Level has nothing to do with it. My real job is chemical sales. There are 5 other guys with the same job at the company but I doubt we all make the same. I'm also pretty sure I make more than the delivery guy even though he does more heavy lifting and is better looking.
I don't see anything wrong with paying someone that brings added value more money.