• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

How does a Peavey T-40 Compare To a Jazz?

Hey guys, so how does a Peavey T-40 compare to a Jazz Bass? i recently got a trade offer for my MIM modified Jazz, and seeing on ebay, the value of a T-40 has gone up. So what do you think in terms of trade? would you do it? what are the drawbacks? or the positives?
:bassist::bassist::bassist::bassist:

Totally different in my opinion. The J has a narrow 1.5 inch nut and the T-40 I had was about 1.75 like a P-Bass. I did not like the PUPs in the T40. They do have a lot of different sounds, but I never quite found the sound I wanted. Plus the T-40 was super heavy, and I tend to like a little heavier bass. Quality was good overall, just not my favorite bass.
 
The T-40 was my first "real" bass. Super heavy with a super thick neck. If the electronics are in good condition you'll have tones of tonal options. Also, if you find one with the reddish/brown burst and tortoise shell pickguard I think it's looks kill any Fender.

Of course, I sold it 15 years ago and only play short-scale hollow-bodies these days.

Still it's the only Peavey I've ever liked.

Really, they are heavy - Once upon a time a friend stop by my place and strapped it on and within a minute was yelling, "Get it off me! Get it off me!". Hah! Granted he was a pretty small, thin guy...do you lift weights?
 
I love T-40s. They have gone up in price (bummer) because for a while, they were like this great secret awesome bass. Nobody wanted them, then the word got out that they are bad ass. I'd pick a T-40 over a MIM jazz. BUT, once again restating, THEY ARE HEAVY! (It needs said in every post!) Get a really thick strap and play short sets. ;)
 
It really is about the sound you are after. MIM fender Jazz sounds like a jazz bass (surprise surprise). T-40 sounds fuller IMO, lacks the presence, somewhat heavier (tone-wise) over the top. It has a lot of tonal possibilities though. Also bridge pickup is a little closer to the bridge. Some digs this (such as myself), but most finds it a little raw and punchy. I personally love it, and interestingly I haven't played a bass that I can say "peavey t-40 sounds like xxxxxx" about.

As everyone said, it is heavier than a dead horse (weight-wise this time).
 
Good thread. I have a T-40 and T-45. I just sold a Rickenbacker 4003 and MIA Fender Jazz. I can get a very, very close Rickenbacker or Jazz tone from my T-40 for a fraction of the price. Granted, the weight of the T-40 is more but it's worth it.

The neck on a T-40 is more like a P-Bass. Not chunky but more wide and flat, if that makes sense. If the T-40 you're being offered for a MIM Jazz and it's in good condition, I'd do it in a heartbeat.

T-40's are finally being recognized as a GREAT sounding and recording bass....much to my chagrin. I'd love to buy 'em all up. Make the trade.
 
thanks for the responses guys.. its just the jazz bass just hasent done anything for me overt he past few weeks, im adapting to new musical styles and ehh.. i could use a bass with more tonal options and blends.

IMHO, everyone should own a T-40!! They are just plain fun to play and can cover a broad range of tone. For < $500 you cannot go wrong.
 
Did you know that T-40's are heavy?




I don't think anyone has mentioned it yet.;)



Luckily, I'm a strapping young man. I just got mine....well, a white loaded body, tuners and string tree that now has a Mighty Mite P-Bass neck (had to modify the heel) on it. Anyway, I love it. Total keeper. I don't like Jazz basses to begin with though.
 
From a trade perspective - it seems pretty fair to me.
Underappreciated MIM Jazz for the underappreciated T-40.

T-40 has a ton of vintage vibe and enough tonal options to keep you busy for awhile (including a dual SC option when you crank the tone controls so you still have a Jazz in there!).

Not sure if it has been mentioned yet - but it has a much chunkier neck than a Jazz and a few extra pounds. :D
 
From a trade perspective - it seems pretty fair to me.
Underappreciated MIM Jazz for the underappreciated T-40.

T-40 has a ton of vintage vibe and enough tonal options to keep you busy for awhile (including a dual SC option when you crank the tone controls so you still have a Jazz in there!).

Not sure if it has been mentioned yet - but it has a much chunkier neck than a Jazz and a few extra pounds. :D



true true... and by the way to see the jazz im trading... go to my username and click on threads i have started or posted or whatever it says and look for FT: MIM jazz etc.. once again thanks for the post!
 
I bought a T-40 in 1979 when they first came out and I loved everything about it. I keep hearing that everybody says they're super heavy and have P-bass width necks. Mine was not heavy and the neck was not that clunky...that's one of the reason's that I bought it. It played well, was balanced and sounded fat with those two fat humbucker pickups. Maybe the ones that are heavy and have bigger necks are from a later preiod. But to answer the original question, if it's in good shape, go for it. Eveybody seems to want these things now... )-(

peaveybass.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: kkaarrll
i LOVE jazz bass tone, and while you can't really nail that tone with a t-40, you can do so many other things with it. i have an MIA jazz, an MIA P and a t-40 and i'll easily go back and forth between which one is gonna be my "main" bass night after night.

i use my t-40 with the neck pup at 10 (single coil) and the bridge pup rolled back to about 7 (humbucker). to me, it sounds somewhere between a jazz and a stingray if it were passive. love it.