This is in reference to Gibson Thunderbirds and similar basses. This does not include Grestch Thunderbirds, which are different beasts entirely.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A legit concern - it was designed by a non-musician. I own a '64 II and ever since acquiring it in 1974, I developed a shift position to address that very concern. The upper nub (no horn) is at my rib-cage and the body-bevel is floating on its own to my side. It puts my left hand comfortably at first position, but... the non-beveled edge digs into my ribcage and created a permanent sore-spot that I still feel every time I play it. I added an upper rear bevel on the Fenderbird I'm playing which really helps.Own - zero (now). Tried them - yes. As much as I think they're cool, I couldn't get along with the reach to the first fret.
That was almost a choice!Not enough.
I never really got on with most Fenders I played. The first time I played a bird, I was hooked. Different strokes!T-Birds are a 10 in looks, 5 in sound, and a 1 in playability for me. Like Rick's, they're a bass I want to love but just can't.
So I own zero. But maybe one day i'll try again.
I love seeing other people rocking em though!
I feel that way about RIC's also. Had a very nice '86 4003 in Fireglow. Sounded good too. Sold it.T-Birds are a 10 in looks, 5 in sound, and a 1 in playability for me. Like Rick's, they're a bass I want to love but just can't.
So I own zero. But maybe one day i'll try again.
I love seeing other people rocking em though!
But speaking of sound - nothing sounds like a T-bird... nothing.