A general approach to counterpoint:
If the melody or solo instrument is moving up—- the bass line moves down.
If the melody or solo instrument is moving down—— the bass line moves up.
This is all it needs to be. There's no reason to overthink it.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
A general approach to counterpoint:
If the melody or solo instrument is moving up—- the bass line moves down.
If the melody or solo instrument is moving down—— the bass line moves up.
I listened to some Scott LaFaro. Whilst his playing was like Coltrane's - very much 'across the barline' with unconventional phrasing - the idea of a bassline that moves in a way to add a lot of movement and texture appeals to me. It's just the conflict of my desires and the reality of 'meat and potatoes' playing being called for a lot of the time. I love playing with space - lots of whole notes and rests, but it's just figuring out how to combine it with counterpoint.
On the contrary, true counterpoint rigorously follows the harmonic progression. The first example that comes to mind in popular music is walking bass. If you have two melodies that are freely overlapping without taking care of harmony, it's also a polyphony but it's not a rigorous counterpoint.any time the bass line does not follow the chords that can be counterpoint
On the contrary, true counterpoint rigorously follows the harmonic progression. The first example that comes to mind in popular music is walking bass. If you have two melodies that are freely overlapping without taking care of harmony, it's also a polyphony but it's not a rigorous counterpoint.
Uh no, you said "any time the bass line does not follow the chords". This is the definition of free polyphony, not rigorous counterpoint. The counterpoint is a melody that strictly follows the chords. It is a chord progression of which all parts also form a separate melody.so ya like I said when the bass and guitar are playing different parts
Uh no, you said "any time the bass line does not follow the chords". This is the definition of free polyphony, not rigorous counterpoint. The counterpoint is a melody that strictly follows the chords. It is a chord progression of which all parts also form a separate melody.
Are we talking about counterpoint? Because if so, your reaction is out of place. If not, and because you officially don't care, feel free to play your diminished chord whenever and wherever you want. But I doubt it will make you feel happy. Learning theory will make it, though.God I hate when people go know it all and argue music theory on things that can be interpreted more than one way ….
I officially don't care
go play a diminished chord and feel happy
Are we talking about counterpoint? Because if so, your reaction is out of place. If not, and because you officially don't care, feel free to play your diminished chord whenever and wherever you want. But I doubt it will make you feel happy. Learning theory will make it, though.![]()