Then you'd have free dinner...![]()
Any pics from the results of this technique?
And shouldn't your signature say,
"The Internet. Where men are men, women are MEN, and kids are FBI agents."?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Then you'd have free dinner...![]()
Any pics from the results of this technique?
And shouldn't your signature say,
"The Internet. Where men are men, women are MEN, and kids are FBI agents."?
...People hear a guy play very well (and look older than a teenager) and think, "wow! he/she's good and it looks like he/she's been playing that thing forever!"
--or--
They hear a rookie playing poorly and think, "Poor dude couldn't even afford a decent instrument. Look! It's already been used all to hell by the last guy who owned it. Must be a craiglist special."
--or--
They hear a teenager playing and see him with a "relic" and think, "Looks like his Uncle Earl passed down the ol' family bass for the kid to learn on. Well, if he sticks with it, he'll get better (or 'he sounds pretty good on that old thing')."...
You lost me, fanatical dream?These are important insights about relics:
Ask yourself these questions:
How many "natural relics" are in the hands of those who did the wear vs. how many are being played by 2nd, 3rd, 4th, nth owners?
They are still "natural" relics!
How many 60 year-old bassists do you see on stage with a relic in their hands? Can you imagine every relic being in the hands of the original owner? What about basses that have 10 peoples wear on their surfaces?
Again, they are still "natural" relics!
Let's just drop this empty criticism of "faux mojo" relics or road worn basses as implying some kind of failure of ones maturity or moral, aesthetic, musical, patriotic, or religious values. "Faux Mojo" relics are not a sign of loss of personal integrity. They are basses with a finish that imitates an old worn instrument. That is all they are.
Just your opinion Dr. Jim, how do you know what a persons true motivation is for owning one?
I feel sad that some people believe that something holy is being desecrated. I can sympathize, but must say it is time to man up and move on. Purists inevitably impale themselves on the slender project of their fanatical dream.

I play in a classic rock band and want that worn look to a P-Bass.
Do you use a stripper or a certain grade of sand paper for worn spots? Then a laquer...I don't know.
Has anyone done this and can show me pics?
Thanks!
. Some of you had good suggestions, thank-you. AND others try to act cool and be a follower.

Just play it A LOT! To be honest I don't get why people like to age their guitars and/or basses. No offense, but you don't need a worn out bass guitar in order to fit in with a classic rock band.![]()
What is so scary about a finish that looks old? It threatens something very important.
Dare I mention that we are talking about objects that by themselves do nothing?
It is the music that matters to me, not the bass finish or the supposed symbolism. .
I notice you have a 1966 P bass on your G.A.S. list.
Why not just settle for a newer, cheaper instrument and give it the treatment? Same difference, right?

