Chase didn't give us an ending.
I need closure, damn it!!
I couldn't agree with you more, Chunk.
David Chase had a great series, but I never thought he'd write such a cop-out ending.
He has a history of doing this in The Sopranos.
If I remember correctly, at the end of the 3rd season, Paulie and Christopher were in a park, and were supposed to whack some Russian guy. The guy got away from them and climbed a tree. Paulie lost his shoe, and he and Christopher had to spend a cold winter night in their car.
That's how the season ended, and next season there was no further mention of what happened to the guy. NO CLOSURE!
Then, at the beginning of the 6th season, Tony goes over to Bobby Bacala's house, and now - POOF! He's married to Tony's sister, and they already have a baby! And we mindless lambs are just supposed to accept it as fact!
David Chase has a great talent for filling up episodes, and even seasons with dead-end plots.
Remember a few seasons ago when about half the episodes focused on Artie Bucco and his restaurant?
What did all that prove? NOTHING! It was just filler and no meat!
Then there was Tony's one-legged Ukanian girlfriend. He wrote her in when he needed to fill time, made her have only one leg to make it a little more interesting, and then she was gone.
Even in the last episode, what was the point of AJ's SUV going on fire, and then his parents scolding him when the series was about 10 minutes from the end?
MORE DEAD-END WASTED TIME!
There are more time-wasting dead-ends, but I can't think of them right now.
In my opinion, David Chase should have ended the Sopranos two seasons ago, and this I feel would have left the show in a much stronger position for the prospect of a full-length movie option.
This series died slowly, the exact opposite of the original Star Trek, which died in its prime.
PHOOEY on that crappy ending, and shame on you, David Chase!
Can you tell I'm ticked off?
Mike
