TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
And the Orange Terror ?
Thanks for this.I gig both a WD and SVT.
The problem I have with comparing a WD against an SVT is which version of the SVT are we talking about? Flat? Mid boosted/scooped? Ultra Hi/Low? Etc. There's a lot of sounds I can pull out of an SVT, some of which the WD isn't particularly good at. Further, (IMO) the 810E is a solid 50% of the SVT sound.
Personally, I think the WD is an outstanding amp, but I think you should get it if you like it for it's WD sound.
IMO, the WD is naturally brighter, clearer, more articulate and more open. It's also the first hybrid amp I've played that didn't make me wish I was playing through a tube amp. It has a great feel that is dynamic to how hard you lean into it. However, it sounds like it sounds and I think the harder you try to shoehorn it into the SVT thing the more frustrating it becomes.
Conversely, the SVT is thicker (some would all it muddy) and more 3D (I don't know how else to describe it). It also naturally does the Ampeg thing, and if that's the sound you're after an SVT will (obviously) do that in spades.
But, swap cabs and plug the WD into the 810e and it sounds more like an SVT, and plug the SVT into the Subway 115/210 and it sounds more like a WD.
Realistically, both amps have powerful EQs that are able to dial in a wide variety of sounds, so it's hard to pigeonhole the amps into a specific "sound", but in very broad strokes that's how I see the differences.
Thanks for this.
My SVT-CL is set pretty much flat with a slight boost at position 3 and no Ultra hi or low. Gain at about 12:00 and master at 1:00 - 5:00.
While I appreciate the 8x10, I've been using vented cabinets like a GB 2x12 or Berg HT322.
Sounds like you can make the bass and low mids sound very similar between the two?
Thank you. Really appreciate the detailed response.Into the same cab with those settings, yes. I can get them similar, but not necessarily the same.
I just messed around with my SVT on those settings (minus the master being that high). Into their matching cabs (WD800 into Subway 115/210) the WD is brighter and more articulate. Goes deeper (ported), but doesn't have that low mid density that the SVT/810 produce and my attempts to EQ it that way just kind of make the amp sound hollowed out (scooping the mids where it's strong while trying to boost the mids where it's weak).
Plug the WD into the 810 and that low mid density is there.
I'm not exactly sure how that will translate into your cabs.
The elephant in the room being the volume. If you're overdriving your SVT I don't know how that'll compare to the 800 overdriven. I run the WD800 into it's limiter all the time and have no complaints about how that sounds, but I'm not in a position to push my SVT that hard and A/B them at the moment.
Thank you. Really appreciate the detailed response.
Sounds like I should try the WD. They seem to be cheaper on the used market than the old WA these days.
I thought of that before, but I feel downsizing is starting to be a necessity, so one amp to do everything is really where I’m going.This feels like a 180 from the suggestions on this thread, but would an IR pedal and a frfr cabinet (e.g. the Headrush, etc.) be an option? It seems like the appealing aspects of your SVT are being lost due to heft and volume, but you may at least be able to create a reasonable facsimile of what you love about it in a more portable, quieter package if you can find a preamp that works for you. It could probably all be acquired relatively cheaply as well, if you wanted to hold on to your current amps for posterity.
I thought of that before, but I feel downsizing is starting to be a necessity, so one amp to do everything is really where I’m going.
This is basically what I was angling towards with my comment, but I appreciate that this approach may not be comfortable for everybody. I figured cab modeling could be the gateway drug to taking the full plunge.I am using a headrush MX5 into the headrush FRFR 112 and an 108. My 3 main reason for going this route.
1. Size: I can get a decent enough reproduction of the SVT that i do not need to lug around that big heavy amp. My rig is about 35 pounds total and takes up very little space on stage
2. Styles: I play many different styles on both my EUB and my P/J. The mx5 allows me to dial in just the right sound for the gig at hand.
3. Amp less stage requirement. Many of my gigs are starting to switch to an amp less setup.... Either I have in-ears or I can use my FRFR for a low volume stage monitor.

As a followup to this: taking this tack doesn't necessarily mean adopting an amp/cab modeling multi effects pedal. If, for example, the only effect you care about is a little bit of overdrive, your entire "stack" could consist of a (e.g.) Nux Melvin Lee Davis preamp pedal (which has amp and cab modeling built in) and the FRFR cab. That might not be exactly the tone stack you want, but there are plenty of alternatives. The point is, this path doesn't necessarily mean effects chains and menu diving.This is basically what I was angling towards with my comment, but I appreciate that this approach may not be comfortable for everybody. I figured cab modeling could be the gateway drug to taking the full plunge.
If you are going to get the TH350, then just get the TH500... It's not that much more $ used, hardly bigger, and the big reason for me is that you get significantly more watts (clean headroom) if you are using a single 8 ohm cab. Which if you end up with a single 14, 2x10 or whatever, is pretty likely. I've had the 350, 500, and 700 watt version of the TH. Great amp!I even think the TH350 would be enough!