TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm possibly in the same boat as the OP. To be honest, the world has moved on. I listened to Weather Report last night for the first time in an age whilst applying Tru-Oil to a guitar body and wet-sanding a neck. I was notified that the CD had finished. Upon reflection I realised I had listened to an entire WR album without taking too much in. Sure the music is all niftily through-composed, but those synth patches and that fretless bass tone became the trademark of lift fuzak and cruiseship muzak. I'm sure it was impressive at the time, but the actual sound of WR has been done to death (and beyond). I cannot think of anybody I know who listens to them casually, it is only bassists/jazz musicians listening for academic excitement. The quality of music is great and all, but ageing badly.
Agree. The fact is, even when it was new it took a lot of effort to listen to. Both compositionally and in terms of the instrumentation, Jaco's music was never all that accessible. It's more impressive the more you know about what he was doing - but we are in a time where people care much less about musical complexity or ability.
Agree. The fact is, even when it was new it took a lot of effort to listen to. Both compositionally and in terms of the instrumentation, Jaco's music was never all that accessible. It's more impressive the more you know about what he was doing - but we are in a time where people care much less about musical complexity or ability.
Agree. The fact is, even when it was new it took a lot of effort to listen to. Both compositionally and in terms of the instrumentation, Jaco's music was never all that accessible. It's more impressive the more you know about what he was doing - but we are in a time where people care much less about musical complexity or ability.
you don't get into Jaco until Jaco gets into you. it may or may not happen, but if it does, it will be an "ah-ha" moment.
Agree. The fact is, even when it was new it took a lot of effort to listen to. Both compositionally and in terms of the instrumentation, Jaco's music was never all that accessible. It's more impressive the more you know about what he was doing - but we are in a time where people care much less about musical complexity or ability.
I, too, have had doubts about Jaco in certain situations, based largely on NYC interactions during his downward spiral in the mid-1980's. OTOH, if you listen to his work with Joni Mitchell, particularly "Hejira,"no way you can say he did not know how to serve the songs, and in a brilliant fashion that sustained the groove while also adding a whole lot of color.
Jaco's manic tendencies make it difficult to generalize about him - he could indeed go off on a self-indulgent tangent. In evaluating Jaco, you have to consider both the good and the bad. And I'm not going to say that everyone has to love Jaco, but I'd hope that opinions are based on a decent survey of his extensive body of work.
I have to agree, I've never been into Jaco either; now Mark King.....that's another story!![]()
In a musical sense isn't "quality" that which conforms to your individual taste. Do people who never listen to classical music really think Yo-Yo Ma is great or do they just accept the opinions of the fans of his genre who say he is great?dumbed down - the fact is there WAS an appreciation of higher art (don't get me wrong I can understand a punk/junk esthetic - so did JP - see Punk Jazz) but, whether it's your taste or not, using your likes & dislikes to determine quality is irrational
striving for better skills and understanding is what makes life worth living
unfortunately technology has become the enemy of excellence in too many places - mediocrity sucks
The fact is, even when it was new it took a lot of effort to listen to. Both compositionally and in terms of the instrumentation, Jaco's music was never all that accessible.
Doesn't one's "taste" change...over time?In a musical sense isn't "quality" that which conforms to your individual taste.
Doesn't one's "taste" change...over time?
If not, we would all still be lauding Nursery Rhymes as the ****.
In this type of threads, I always say "listening is an art & skill...and needs to be tweaked/honed/practiced, yaddayadda".
And I usually get blasted by those who just like listening to what they already like-
("...why waste my valuable time listening to something I know I am not gonna like", blahblah, etc).
For some, work = pleasure.But really, for most it is the "middle road". Music listening is a pleasure. It should not be work.
...and that's fine by me. I have been in many bands with guys like that. They can only play "what they know"...after a couple of decades of frustration, I learned it is better to just avoid these situations.You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. What if it is just not thirsty?
For some, work = pleasure.
...and that's fine by me. I have been in many bands with guys like that. They can only play "what they know"...after a couple of decades of frustration, I learned it is better to just avoid these situations.
it would be interesting to find out which players the "Jaco's not my thing" cats are into.