• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I hate to admit it...,

I started on dirt bikes too. I stopped riding after a thief stole my bike and destroyed first gear. That resulted in a burnt out clutch from always starting in second gear. After that, I focused on my career, but my love of motorcycles never died.


This is definitely a bike that can be ridden hard. I admit that it hurts my pride to get a “beginner” bike, but if I am honest with with myself, the only larger bike I would be comfortable with would be a low revving cruiser sort of bike like a Yamaha Bolt or a Triumph Street Twin. The Suzuki 650 V-Strom was also a bike that I found very easy to handle, but for some crazy reason, my insurance company charges insane rates for the 650 and 1000cc V-Strom.

More plastic to break?
 
14739719-1BCC-444E-BF0D-518BC60970E1.jpeg
Since I am now looking 500cc bikes, maybe the Harley 500 might work too?
This is one I saw in the parking lot, and looks, but it seems to have a really low seat height, and is old school with two shocks instead the huge monoshock most bikes have these days, but I do love V-twins!
 


This is definitely a bike that can be ridden hard. I admit that it hurts my pride to get a “beginner” bike, but if I am honest with with myself, the only larger bike I would be comfortable with would be a low revving cruiser sort of bike like a Yamaha Bolt or a Triumph Street Twin. The Suzuki 650 V-Strom was also a bike that I found very easy to handle, but for some crazy reason, my insurance company charges insane rates for the 650 and 1000cc V-Strom.

SV650s were considered "beginner bikes", too. They were also a whole lot of fun to race, because they were light, could be made to handle, and had an entertaining power band. There's no shame in riding a "beginner bike." If anything, it would just prove that you don't care what other people think. I see a whole lot of 250s and 300s on the street out here lately. About half of those will end up on the racetrack eventually, because flogging a slow bike is so much fun.

I wouldn't call a Street Triple low revving. If you keep your hoof out of the throttle, it can act like a low revving machine, but it still has plenty of top end on tap if you want it. It just won't run out of revs as soon as some other motors.
 
I just looked up the numbers, the little Harley has 33.5 bhp and 29.5 ft. Lbs of torque. It also weighs 70 pounds more than the Honda. That sounds like a real slug!
It probably is a real slug. That wouldn't make it a bad bike if it's still fun to ride. But being a Harley, it's probably more expensive to go along with everything else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
SV650s were considered "beginner bikes", too. They were also a whole lot of fun to race, because they were light, could be made to handle, and had an entertaining power band. There's no shame in riding a "beginner bike." If anything, it would just prove that you don't care what other people think. I see a whole lot of 250s and 300s on the street out here lately. About half of those will end up on the racetrack eventually, because flogging a slow bike is so much fun.

I wouldn't call a Street Triple low revving. If you keep your hoof out of the throttle, it can act like a low revving machine, but it still has plenty of top end on tap if you want it. It just won't run out of revs as soon as some other motors.

I would not call the Street Triple a low revver at all! It does have a torquey engine that punched me in the back sort of like the Bolt did. I know I could get used to it, it’s just that on the CB500, I did not have to worry unleashing gobs of power. Since I will probably buy something after Christmas, the Triple is not off the table. The Triumph Street Twin, however, is a low revver with a Harley style power curve. It is over $9,000, so not cheap by my standards, but if I have a bigger down payment, it could be affordable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaolee
I would not call the Street Triple a low revver at all! It does have a torquey engine that punched me in the back sort of like the Bolt did. I know I could get used to it, it’s just that on the CB500, I did not have to worry unleashing gobs of power. Since I will probably buy something after Christmas, the Triple is not off the table. The Triumph Street Twin, however, is a low revver with a Harley style power curve. It is over $9,000, so not cheap by my standards, but if I have a bigger down payment, it could be affordable.
Street Twin. Got it. I missed the two vs. three part. DOH!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
EE89281B-8E99-46D4-983E-305FFD917960.jpeg
EE89281B-8E99-46D4-983E-305FFD917960.jpeg
I am thinking of bigger bikes again. I like the options a little more size and power allow. Who knows, maybe test riding the CB500F was a little nudge I needed because I took it on the freeway and did fine. If I get a bigger bike, there is no reason why I couldn’t take it easy for a month or two. I am not a kid, I have gone fast before. I know enough now to not push my skills before I am ready.

To top it off, the Triumph Tiger 1050 above, that I almost bought in August, is still around. I may need to move quickly!
 

Attachments

  • ACB4EBEB-355A-4161-B50A-B05A32C692B6.jpeg
    ACB4EBEB-355A-4161-B50A-B05A32C692B6.jpeg
    728.6 KB · Views: 26
Last edited:
Just brought home dad's bike. He quit riding at 84.

900 miles with the last 180 in the mountains in the rain. 800cc and shaft drive. Not a lot of speed, but usuable torque in all gears. If you pay attention and don't get silly, you'll be fine.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4398.JPG
    IMG_4398.JPG
    973 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_4463.JPG
    IMG_4463.JPG
    754.9 KB · Views: 18
  • IMG_4470.JPG
    IMG_4470.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 16
  • IMG_4471.JPG
    IMG_4471.JPG
    298.5 KB · Views: 16
Just brought home dad's bike. He quit riding at 84.

900 miles with the last 180 in the mountains in the rain. 800cc and shaft drive. Not a lot of speed, but usuable torque in all gears. If you pay attention and don't get silly, you'll be fine.

Thanks, I have just had to honest with myself that I am a bit nervous. I am not really afraid, but I understand what can go wrong much more clearly than when I was young. What kind of bike was your father riding. I had assumed it was a Harley, but Harley does belts these days, not shaft drives. Is it a Kawasaki?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaolee
Suzuki C-50 cruiser. It's pretty comfortable.

Take an MSF beginning class to reawaken your skills. Being older, we know what can happen and our friends always are there to remind us. Being cautious and a bit nervous is good. Tense and afraid is no fun, though.
 
I used to ride a '75 Honda CB500 in the early '80s. Plenty of power for me. Wore it out and traded for a '74 Honda CB550-Four. It had a little more top end, but I actually liked the feel of the twin better. Years later I got a 2002 Sportster 1200 Custom. Much more power, of course, but I was never one to cut up on it anyway. Sold it and now have a 2007 Road King Standard. Love it, but miss my small bikes.

Thing is, I really just like to cruise. Just roll along. I love bottom end more than top end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
17995E53-93A3-4F77-9498-50A14E00D1DE.jpeg
17995E53-93A3-4F77-9498-50A14E00D1DE.jpeg
0AAD9B83-A520-4F10-B0DB-C026EF29BA2E.jpeg
7AD3BD3A-355B-46AD-B466-A4BE3DC32E9E.jpeg


I rode these two bikes today for 14 miles a piece and I had a ball! The top one is a 2012 Triumph Speedmaster, the bottom one is a new old stock 2016 Moto Guzzi V9 Roamer. They are both torque heavy, low revving bikes. They were easy to ride, and frankly, they were easy to ride fast because I did not have to about wheelies or hitting a spot in the power band where they are flying. It would be great if I were totally comfortable with a 100-200 bhp bike, but fun doesn’t truly come until the rider is secure in his or her ability to control a bike.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gaolee

Latest posts