I know what I’m talking about...

[Element Zero]

Hola. I've been playing for X amount of years and I know what I'm talking about. I'm going to state my opinion in such a manner that it can be read as pure fact. You are sure allowed to state your opinion, but that's all it will ever be. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's cool too because nobody is perfect.

 

[/\/\3phist0]

Hola. I've been playing for X amount of years and I know what I'm talking about. I'm going to state my opinion in such a manner that it can be read as puwre fact. You are sure allowed to state your opinion, but that's all it will ever be. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's cool too because nobody is perfect.

I've been playing for XX years, your pure fact is fallicious and is to be ignored. Fact is as changeable as the flow of the tide.

 

[Element Zero]

I've been playing for XX years, your pure fact is fallicious and is to be ignored. Fact is as changeable as the flow of the tide.
View attachment 3201561

I see your written opinion. Nobody is perfect... Even Spock as a half bread cannot deny his flawed humanistic side.

 

[/\/\3phist0]

I see your written opinion. Nobody is perfect... Even Spock as a half bread cannot deny his flawed humanistic side.

 

[fearceol]

Fact..!! This post does not belong in "General Instruction".

 

[RustyAxe]

Pretty familiar! Here's how my mind reads these kinds of posts ...

Hola. I've been playing for X amount of years and I know what I'm talking about.

I'm sure you do.

I'm going to state my opinion in such a manner that it can be read as pure fact.

Please do.

You are sure allowed to state your opinion, but that's all it will ever be.

I will. Of course.

If you don't agree with my opinion, that's cool too because nobody is perfect.

Right, and I'll graciously allow you to be wrong.

 

[IamGroot]

The relativist fallacy, also known as the subjectivist fallacy, is claiming that something is true for one person but not true for someone else. The fallacy is supposed to rest on the law of noncontradiction. The fallacy applies only to objective facts, or what are alleged to be objective facts, rather than to facts about personal tastes or subjective experiences, and only to facts regarded in the same sense and at the same time. On this formulation, the very name "relativist fallacy" begs the question against anyone who earnestly (however mistakenly or not) holds that there are no "objective facts." So some more work must be done, in a non-question-begging way, to make it clear wherein, exactly, the fallacy lies.

 

[IamGroot]

But in this case, I think the poster is more about relative phallacy....which may be incest.

 

[Old Garage-Bander]

I see your written opinion. Nobody is perfect... Even Spock as a half bread cannot deny his flawed humanistic side.

That's a profiling remark against those green blooded hob-goblin Vulcans. You Anti-Vulcanist you.

 

[EdwardofHuncote]

Oh great, the mods let Jeff Berlin off the leash again...

 

[Drucifer]

Dunning–Kruger effect
In psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiorityand mistakenly assess their cognitive abilityas greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from the inability of low-ability people to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.

 

[Relsom]

My head hurts. Can we just go and get some tacos now?

 

[Element Zero]

The relativist fallacy, also known as the subjectivist fallacy, is claiming that something is true for one person but not true for someone else. The fallacy is supposed to rest on the law of noncontradiction. The fallacy applies only to objective facts, or what are alleged to be objective facts, rather than to facts about personal tastes or subjective experiences, and only to facts regarded in the same sense and at the same time. On this formulation, the very name "relativist fallacy" begs the question against anyone who earnestly (however mistakenly or not) holds that there are no "objective facts." So some more work must be done, in a non-question-begging way, to make it clear wherein, exactly, the fallacy lies.

 

[Element Zero]

That's a profiling remark against those green blooded hob-goblin Vulcans. You Anti-Vulcanist you.

I'm only pointing out Spock. As far as I know, he's the only half human half Vulcan. How dare you accuse me of such immoral judgement.

 

[Element Zero]

Dunning–Kruger effect
In psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiorityand mistakenly assess their cognitive abilityas greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from the inability of low-ability people to recognize their lack of ability. Without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.

I read this argument before when flat earthers claim everyone else suffers from cognitive dissonance because we "normal" people refute their "evidence" which is always failed and disproven experiments concocted many decades ago.

 

[Element Zero]

Oh great, the mods let Jeff Berlin off the leash again...

Lol awwwww. He wasn't THAT bad... was he?

 

[Element Zero]

My head hurts. Can we just go and get some tacos now?

I'm SO down.

 

[Slevage]

Some fast food joints have been making burgers for about 40 or 50 years.

I don't follow their recipe when I want to make a delicious hamburger, though I might review their methods if I am prepping for a colonoscopy.

 

[Woolber]

I see your written opinion. Nobody is perfect... Even Spock as a half bread cannot deny his flawed humanistic side.

Wait, what? Spock is bread? I thought he was half Vulcan.

 

[Deleted member 165050]

Hola. I've been playing for X amount of years and I know what I'm talking about. I'm going to state my opinion in such a manner that it can be read as pure fact. You are sure allowed to state your opinion, but that's all it will ever be. If you don't agree with my opinion, that's cool too because nobody is perfect.

Until you define X your statement is invalid. Once X is defined all must accept that there is a greater X somewhere. Possibly many of them. Beware X.