I would lean towards advising the Frog... but there is the old saying "If you go on a spree then go the whole hog including the postage."
In line with that, I would point you over here (still in your budget, but there might be a waiting list)
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I would lean towards advising the Frog... 
The dingwall has far too many knobs.My main player is a Hammersmith 5 string. It has a P bass pickup at the neck, a dual coil at the bridge, and all passive electronics.
For a dozen reasons, I'll never get another Hammersmith like this one.
My other 5 simply doesn't fit any of the scenarios where I play. It just looks too "rock". I love it. But I'm not going to play it in church. And I'm not going to play it with my band that plays a country song one minute, "Can't Stop the Feeling" the next, and Journey the next.
So I need another "main player" 5 string.
I started a thread a while back about Dingwall basses in a dad band. That still has my attention. They look and sound pretty great to me.
For some reason I keep going to the Public Peace configurator and playing with headless Frog variations (with Extender pickups). See pic below for those who are not familiar.
The wide spaced G&L 2500 basses look like they would be fantastic.
And I have been fighting the urge to simply pull the trigger on a 5 string Stingray Special HARD. (Brace yourselves.) I would mod the crap out of the Ray. I might even put a P bass pickup literally touching the MM pickup and wire up some passive options.
This isn't scientific. And, ultimately, it's my choice. I get that. But let's toss around these options (or whatever pops into your head) and see what happens.
I lean toward passive. But I'm not opposed to active.
My budget would probably be up to about three grand ($3000 US Dollars). I could spend a little more if something amazing comes along.
Versatility. It's gotta be versatile. I usually "set it and forget it" on my amp. And I use hand techniques and on board electronics for variations through the gig.
Gotta be 5 strings.
Hit the poll and blurt out whatever comes to mind! No wrong answers. I'm just spitballing.
(I've got half a dozen 4 strings or more.... fretless, P bass with Chromes, P bass with rounds, etc. So all the other sonic basses/bases are covered.)
View attachment 4898875
I feel you… Mrs. Dean shares Mrs. Fingers sentiments.My instincts say get one of each.... and a new place to live cuz Mrs.Fingers will not see the humor/practicality in my choices.
Let's not follow my instincts here.
![]()
#1 choice without question, great build quality and not expensive. Checkout the Maruszczyk owners club. I put the Xtenders (+ Noll 4-band) in my last build, and love them. Super versatile, I cover similar music and they work great.My main player is a Hammersmith 5 string. It has a P bass pickup at the neck, a dual coil at the bridge, and all passive electronics.
For a dozen reasons, I'll never get another Hammersmith like this one.
My other 5 simply doesn't fit any of the scenarios where I play. It just looks too "rock". I love it. But I'm not going to play it in church. And I'm not going to play it with my band that plays a country song one minute, "Can't Stop the Feeling" the next, and Journey the next.
So I need another "main player" 5 string.
I started a thread a while back about Dingwall basses in a dad band. That still has my attention. They look and sound pretty great to me.
For some reason I keep going to the Public Peace configurator and playing with headless Frog variations (with Extender pickups). See pic below for those who are not familiar.
The wide spaced G&L 2500 basses look like they would be fantastic.
And I have been fighting the urge to simply pull the trigger on a 5 string Stingray Special HARD. (Brace yourselves.) I would mod the crap out of the Ray. I might even put a P bass pickup literally touching the MM pickup and wire up some passive options.
This isn't scientific. And, ultimately, it's my choice. I get that. But let's toss around these options (or whatever pops into your head) and see what happens.
I lean toward passive. But I'm not opposed to active.
My budget would probably be up to about three grand ($3000 US Dollars). I could spend a little more if something amazing comes along.
Versatility. It's gotta be versatile. I usually "set it and forget it" on my amp. And I use hand techniques and on board electronics for variations through the gig.
Gotta be 5 strings.
Hit the poll and blurt out whatever comes to mind! No wrong answers. I'm just spitballing.
(I've got half a dozen 4 strings or more.... fretless, P bass with Chromes, P bass with rounds, etc. So all the other sonic basses/bases are covered.)
View attachment 4898875

The wide spaced G&L 2500 basses look like they would be fantastic. ...
Versatility. It's gotta be versatile.
As previous owner, I can say “this Frog” is an awesome bass!!!@two fingers Maruszchyk Frog 5 Headless are great looking basses, this is the one I bought here on TB...not the PU's that you're looking for but I'm just sayin...![]()
![]()