• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I need a second "main player" bass.

Which one and why? If other, please share why.

  • Dingwall

    Votes: 38 20.0%
  • Ray

    Votes: 27 14.2%
  • G&L

    Votes: 50 26.3%
  • Frog

    Votes: 25 13.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 50 26.3%

  • Total voters
    190
@two fingers Maruszchyk Frog 5 Headless are great looking basses, this is the one I bought here on TB...
img_2582-jpeg.4751784
not the PU's that you're looking for but I'm just sayin... ;)
 
I got an LTD AP-5 last year in black and it can do everything I've ever needed. Can sound mellow with fingers in a church setting, aggressive with a pick in a rock setting, and anything else I'll ever need. It has active pickups but controls like a passive, no onboard EQ or anything, just volume, balance, and tone. And it just looks like a typical PJ bass so it can fit any genre in the looks department. Cannot recommend enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TonyP-
My main player is a Hammersmith 5 string. It has a P bass pickup at the neck, a dual coil at the bridge, and all passive electronics.

For a dozen reasons, I'll never get another Hammersmith like this one.

My other 5 simply doesn't fit any of the scenarios where I play. It just looks too "rock". I love it. But I'm not going to play it in church. And I'm not going to play it with my band that plays a country song one minute, "Can't Stop the Feeling" the next, and Journey the next.

So I need another "main player" 5 string.

I started a thread a while back about Dingwall basses in a dad band. That still has my attention. They look and sound pretty great to me.

For some reason I keep going to the Public Peace configurator and playing with headless Frog variations (with Extender pickups). See pic below for those who are not familiar.

The wide spaced G&L 2500 basses look like they would be fantastic.

And I have been fighting the urge to simply pull the trigger on a 5 string Stingray Special HARD. (Brace yourselves.) I would mod the crap out of the Ray. I might even put a P bass pickup literally touching the MM pickup and wire up some passive options.

This isn't scientific. And, ultimately, it's my choice. I get that. But let's toss around these options (or whatever pops into your head) and see what happens.

I lean toward passive. But I'm not opposed to active.

My budget would probably be up to about three grand ($3000 US Dollars). I could spend a little more if something amazing comes along.

Versatility. It's gotta be versatile. I usually "set it and forget it" on my amp. And I use hand techniques and on board electronics for variations through the gig.

Gotta be 5 strings.

Hit the poll and blurt out whatever comes to mind! No wrong answers. I'm just spitballing.

(I've got half a dozen 4 strings or more.... fretless, P bass with Chromes, P bass with rounds, etc. So all the other sonic basses/bases are covered.)
View attachment 4898875
The dingwall has far too many knobs.

Id hit a jazz bass. Slap a MM in the sweet spot, right between them. All Delano pickups.
 
Last edited:
I've been yearning for a Dingwall for some time now. I like the Lee Sklar signature model but a regular NG-3 would be fine too. I'm very interested in have a fan fret fingerboard and with that 37" long B-sting, it reputedly has much better tension than a 34" or 35" standard neck provides. B strings can be kind of floppy on 34" necks. Plus I like the combination choices of three pickups. That bass is capable of a LOT of different sounds.

SklarSigInBlue.jpg
 
My main player is a Hammersmith 5 string. It has a P bass pickup at the neck, a dual coil at the bridge, and all passive electronics.

For a dozen reasons, I'll never get another Hammersmith like this one.

My other 5 simply doesn't fit any of the scenarios where I play. It just looks too "rock". I love it. But I'm not going to play it in church. And I'm not going to play it with my band that plays a country song one minute, "Can't Stop the Feeling" the next, and Journey the next.

So I need another "main player" 5 string.

I started a thread a while back about Dingwall basses in a dad band. That still has my attention. They look and sound pretty great to me.

For some reason I keep going to the Public Peace configurator and playing with headless Frog variations (with Extender pickups). See pic below for those who are not familiar.

The wide spaced G&L 2500 basses look like they would be fantastic.

And I have been fighting the urge to simply pull the trigger on a 5 string Stingray Special HARD. (Brace yourselves.) I would mod the crap out of the Ray. I might even put a P bass pickup literally touching the MM pickup and wire up some passive options.

This isn't scientific. And, ultimately, it's my choice. I get that. But let's toss around these options (or whatever pops into your head) and see what happens.

I lean toward passive. But I'm not opposed to active.

My budget would probably be up to about three grand ($3000 US Dollars). I could spend a little more if something amazing comes along.

Versatility. It's gotta be versatile. I usually "set it and forget it" on my amp. And I use hand techniques and on board electronics for variations through the gig.

Gotta be 5 strings.

Hit the poll and blurt out whatever comes to mind! No wrong answers. I'm just spitballing.

(I've got half a dozen 4 strings or more.... fretless, P bass with Chromes, P bass with rounds, etc. So all the other sonic basses/bases are covered.)
View attachment 4898875
#1 choice without question, great build quality and not expensive. Checkout the Maruszczyk owners club. I put the Xtenders (+ Noll 4-band) in my last build, and love them. Super versatile, I cover similar music and they work great.
0669CD98-C8C8-4D38-98A6-A4314F0BAA7C.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Latest posts