I've been looking at various IEM systems and I've noticed quite a few of the "personal mixers" don't have limiters. Is this worth getting concerned over?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
You can get a very nice limiter from Rolls for about $70, so it's something you can always add to a headphone amp. I think it's called the SL 33 or something like that.
I've been using a Rolls headphone amp without a limiter for a few dozen gigs (we have very nice automatic feedback suppression on our PA), but I'm about to order one of the Rolls units just to be on the safe side.
Marko5657 said:I don't mean to be rude, and of course you can do what you want, but that's not good advice, nor responsible advice to give to another.
Imo...
You don't know the details of my situation or setup. There are a variety of ways to achieve feedback control and limiting within a system. We're using several levels of it.
That being said, I was advising the OP that there's an affordable product available (the Rolls limiter) that might make an IEM system that had no limiting a workable option. I'm probably adding one myself as yet another level of protection, as you can never have too much protection.
I hope you do a bit more consuliting before you consider that that'll put you "on the safe side".
And I dont mean to be rude, but a persons hearing is a serious matter, and of course you can do whatever you want, but thats not good advice.
Imo
Because you don't know where the limiter is set. Is it set to engage before the level gets dangerous? Does the person reading have any idea how to tell where it IS set, and where it SHOULD be set?Why do you think that putting a Rolls SL33 limiter between a Rolls PM351 and IEMs would not be sufficient to put someone "on the safe side"? Why is recommending one not good advice?
Thanks,
Pete