I could play either for the rest of my years and be quite happy.
That said, I like my Carvins mo' better.
That said, I like my Carvins mo' better.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I personally find it very interesting that it is exactly the opposite of the Fender/Fodera poll, with Sadowsky holding a steady 60% after 100 votes.
Sad. What if I pick any fender and wind up with a P?Sads at least guarantee me a preamp.
I don't see the point of this one. The Fodera or Fender question at least compared basses that have significant differences in the style of construction. When it comes to Fender or Sadowsky, it is more a question of which tone or neck profile does a person like the most. Quality of construction can be an issue, but depending on the Fender, the construction can be very close.
multiman said:I would put Sadowsky's in the same class as the Fender custom shop -- which is pretty much an American Standard that is way overpriced.
People say the line is more consistent -- but I don't care about the line. I just need one. And it's not that hard to find a good American Standard.
john nam said:So why am I doing this type of poll again? It's because for me, I really don't know if I would choose Fender, Fodera or Sadowsky for my ONE bass. If Fender made a 60's 5 string with a good B, I would pick that, but they didn't. FWIW, I've owned all 3 and various models of each of them.
I've wondered if the Fender CS and Sadowsky were comparable, because as much as I love Fenders overall, it would seem hard to beat a Sadowsky. The various video interviews on youtube of Roger Sadowsky have really impressed me lately, and now I'm dying to get my hands on one!
OTOH, I already have a Fender that I could live with from now on just fine, but I'd rather spend eternity with my StingRay.