TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Sadowsky....every time
Although I believe it'd be more relevant to compare Fender to---
Lull
Sadowsky
Nordstrand
Alleva-Coppola
And any other top of the line Fender boutique basses
Agreed. I'd have to go with the Lull. Otherwise...between the Fender and the Sadowsky I'd have to go with Fender.
I love 'em all, but the Sadowsky's are better built, more versatile instruments. The array of sounds Sadowsky's produce through pickup blends, VTC, and bass/treble control is nothing short of amazing. Intonation is perfect and stays perfect.
I should have just copied this post. This sums it up exactly. It doesn't mean I don't love my three Fenders. As a working bass player, for the reasons listed above, the Sadowsky delivers so much more.

"Blows away"? Have you actually played a Sadowsky or are you just trolling?... for much more money!!!
IMHO, Fender is the clear winner here regardless of the poll. the "bang for buck" favors the Fender Standards by a mile. case in point,..
my $1100 AV62RI blows away the average $2.5-3k Sadowsky's that i've played.
was i surprized? hell yeah!!! i wanted to love the Sad, if not for all the hooplah, then for that famous tone. BUT,... it was not as playable as any of my Fenders from MIM to MIA.YMMV
... for much more money!!!
IMHO, Fender is the clear winner here regardless of the poll. the "bang for buck" favors the Fender Standards by a mile. case in point,..
my $1100 AV62RI blows away the average $2.5-3k Sadowsky's that i've played.
was i surprized? hell yeah!!! i wanted to love the Sad, if not for all the hooplah, then for that famous tone. BUT,... it was not as playable as any of my Fenders from MIM to MIA.YMMV
I wonder if you know the story behind why Roger chose the original design he did. I also wonder how you feel about acoustic guitar designs and the lack of originality inherent in practically every acoustic guitar available on the market (or any orchestral instrument, for that matter...).This question has proven the proposition that opinions are as numerous as the people of whom they are requested, and nothing more.
Mine would be that as great a man and builder as Sadowski is reported to be, he is less for having built that reputation on the back of the Fender original design. I appreciate that there are original designs with his name affixed, but, simply put, why would I pick a copy of the Mona Lisa over the original if given the choice? I would have greater respect for the Sadowski choice if they walked away from building copies of a Fender, and even more if he/they had never built a Fender design variant.
For less money than the cost of an original 427 Cobra, one can build a replica which outperforms the original work in every respect BUT originality. Park the two together and let me choose, I'll take the original every time simply because it is that, original; warts and all.
My Squier is a Fender, copy of the original though it may be. It is the one guitar I've found which I can afford that lets me feel the joy my '65 Jazz gave me "in the day". I could never imagine that from a Sado at any price.
iJazz
bass12 said:I wonder if you know the story behind why Roger chose the original design he did. I also wonder how you feel about acoustic guitar designs and the lack of originality inherent in practically every acoustic guitar available on the market (or any orchestral instrument, for that matter...).