• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I'm predicting the end for Carvin.

I personally think Carvins are great basses. I wanted a Bunny Brunel 4 string so bad, and by the time I could order one they quit making it. I ended up buying a used one and it turned out to be under 8 pounds and the best 4 string I've ever had. It was made during their 'crappy truss rod' era and I wanted to cry when I broke the truss rod. It still does fine but I wonder how long it will be before it becomes unplayable. Even though I love the Bunny I thought about another Carvin when it came time for another new bass. I don't care much for the Vanquish shape, and you can't get MM pickups in a Vanquish or Icon. Every LB70 I saw was close to 10 pounds so I gave up and bought a Roscoe instead.

If they would bring back the Bunny shape I'd be in trouble. I love my Roscoes, but that oiled neck on my Carvin is the shizzle. I have to steel wool my Roscoe neck every time I play it because of the stickiness.
 
The Carvin name was *never* "powerful." Pretty much the entire point of the Kiesel re-branding was trying to get away from the toxic Carvin brand name. Doesn't matter the quality of instrument they offered, Carvin was an also-ran, at best. Their move towards an aggressive re-branding is the best idea they've had in literally decades. They've been making fairly bold moves, investing in headless and fanned-fret instruments, with premier (or "premier," however you like) finishes and colors, trying to make some room for the name that, frankly, Carvin never had, and never will/would.

The end of Carvin? If they play their cards right.

Funny, it wasn't until this thread that I'd even thought of Carvin as an instrument maker since maybe, uh, 1993? I have no idea what the Kiesel thing is at all. I'm'a say that they've not been relevant in my world outside of being a source for cheap raw-drivers for years. I always liked their PS12 for bass when put in the right box.
 
In 2013 I rediscovered Carvin basses...hadn't seen one played in a long time. I found some players who let me try theirs and, about two weeks later I bought a six year old Icon 5 with all the goodies off e-bay. It was pristine and is my number one. I liked it so much a bought an even older fretless 5 (defretted (oops!)). I really love the Icon and it was a steal at $900. $1,600 new. GEEZ YOU DROVE IT OFF THE LOT WITH THE TITLE: IT’S NOT NEW ANYMORE! Always wanted to visit the store - the plant, in Petaluma? Did they close all (both) stores? If they can still make basses the quality of my Icon they are not going anywhere.
 
1. The Kiesel breakoff seems to have hurt Carvin as far as BASS guitars go. IMO

(I am not an endorsee or employee of Carvin or Kiesel Guitars) I was just there today picking up strings. I'm there once every 4-6 weeks. When I go in I scan all the basses and play a few. Today I played this one. First thing I noticed was the neck was thru body and was an exotic hardwood of some sort. The string spacing as (guessing) 17.5-18mm. This is a change from the usual 19 spacing on Carvin basses. The fretwork was really good. The neck profile along with the body style and woods used reminded me of a US MTD 535. This bass was not *sort of* close, this bass left NOTHING wanting for me personally. Price, $1800 ish. Higher than expected from "Carvin"? Yes. But every piece of wood was NAMM grade. There was also a 5 string J style Bass that had an incredible myrtle burl top that was stained a beautiful coral blue. Kiesel basses are leaving Fender USA Elite in the rear view mirror. I saw this coming a few years back and from what I saw today confirms it.
 

Attachments

  • Carvin.jpg
    Carvin.jpg
    1.3 MB · Views: 168
I agree with most regarding great quality and features, but underwhelming sound. Most Carvin basses I've played were really well made and easy to play, but had bland sound. If you bought one and changed the pickups and preamp, you'd have and amazing bass.

Carvin tends to have trendy styles, and used ones tend to look very dated.

I think that the Carvin/Kiesel split is good for The guitars/bass operations. I think that adding a line of pickup options like Nordstrand, Aguilar, or Bart's would make their guitars more desirable.
 
I personally think Carvins are great basses. I wanted a Bunny Brunel 4 string so bad, and by the time I could order one they quit making it. I ended up buying a used one and it turned out to be under 8 pounds and the best 4 string I've ever had. It was made during their 'crappy truss rod' era and I wanted to cry when I broke the truss rod. It still does fine but I wonder how long it will be before it becomes unplayable. Even though I love the Bunny I thought about another Carvin when it came time for another new bass. I don't care much for the Vanquish shape, and you can't get MM pickups in a Vanquish or Icon. Every LB70 I saw was close to 10 pounds so I gave up and bought a Roscoe instead.

If they would bring back the Bunny shape I'd be in trouble. I love my Roscoes, but that oiled neck on my Carvin is the shizzle. I have to steel wool my Roscoe neck every time I play it because of the stickiness.
It's a common misconception that you can't get custom options in Kiesel/Carvin builds. If you want a MM pickup in a Kiesel bass, just supply them with it before the build. They will charge you extra, but that's to be expected, I guess.
 
My main squeeze has been an LB75 with a maple fingerboard since 1996. It's well worn in now and sounds better than ever. I put J99's on it and breathed even more new life into it. Two weeks ago another player sat in with my band and described it as playing like butter. The best strings I've ever found for it are EB's - especially Cobalts.
 
Here are some pictures of my Icon 5, which I had built in October 2015. it sounds great (though not quite as good as my Warwick Katana) with the single coil pickups.

If I had been a little more patient, I would have acquired the MEC pickups and pre-amp used in my Katana then had them installed during the build.

Yes, you can check boxes all day, but if you want different pickups and/or electronics, by all means, call them up and they will quote you how much extra it will be. You are not restricted to the checkboxes when ordering. They are simply there for convenience.

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed

Invalid Link Removed
 
I agree with most regarding great quality and features, but underwhelming sound. Most Carvin basses I've played were really well made and easy to play, but had bland sound. If you bought one and changed the pickups and preamp, you'd have and amazing bass.

Carvin tends to have trendy styles, and used ones tend to look very dated.

I think that the Carvin/Kiesel split is good for The guitars/bass operations. I think that adding a line of pickup options like Nordstrand, Aguilar, or Bart's would make their guitars more desirable.
I like to refer to that "bland" sound as "neutral"! ;) It's an easy sound to shape to your liking!
 
It's a common misconception that you can't get custom options in Kiesel/Carvin builds. If you want a MM pickup in a Kiesel bass, just supply them with it before the build. They will charge you extra, but that's to be expected, I guess.

I believe you also waive your 10 day trial period if you do that though.
 
(I am not an endorsee or employee of Carvin or Kiesel Guitars) I was just there today picking up strings. I'm there once every 4-6 weeks. When I go in I scan all the basses and play a few. Today I played this one. First thing I noticed was the neck was thru body and was an exotic hardwood of some sort. The string spacing as (guessing) 17.5-18mm. This is a change from the usual 19 spacing on Carvin basses.

'Narrow' spacing is actually standard on all Icons and LB's. Everything else (I think) is normal 19mm.
 
There is no one who knows anything about electric guitars and basses that doesn't know at least something about Carvin. I think Kiesel relies on that just for the new name to have any relevance in the marketplace. Whatever you think of the brand or the product, the battle for recognition amongst the most intensive users of the product was won ages ago.
 
Last edited:
1. The Kiesel breakoff seems to have hurt Carvin as far as BASS guitars go. IMO
2. Unusual bass styles no one has really taken to. IMO.
3. Instruments so good these days from everywhere that Carvin is not price competitive anymore.
4. But still pay US wages.
5. Poor reputation for amp failures.
6. So many quality boutique builders at competitive prices.
7. Incredible deals on all kinds of used instruments, way below Carvin prices.
8. I saw a poor instrument reveal video by the Kiesel son, which seemed unprofessional and desperate to me.
9. Carvin name is just not as powerful anymore.

It seems that until technology had caught up - that Carvin filled a real need. A quality American instrument, at below Fender prices with some customization. BACK IN THE DAY. Now, you can get what you want almost anywhere, and below Carvin prices for comparable quality or better.

I'm not too in tune with their guitar business, but I imagine that it's their pro audio gear and regular guitars that will keep them in business.

Aside from just a "gut feeling", what do base your first assertion on? I saw them at NAMM and they appear to be *identical* to Carvin basses but with a different name on them. In fact, I think the name change is silly but it hardly changes the instruments.

And some folks - myself included - will pay real money for US made products. I will - and do - gladly pay more for non MIC gear.
 
My only issue with Carvin/ Kiesel is the weight, they tend to be over 9 lbs, even for the basic 4-string models. (and of course the resell) You will take a beating, ESPECIALLY if you order all the fancy woods and finishes which add nothing to the sound/playability.
 

Latest posts