Jeff Kiesel posted a teaser pic of a fanned fret five string on Instagram. Looks like that project is becoming a reality.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
The Carvin name was *never* "powerful." Pretty much the entire point of the Kiesel re-branding was trying to get away from the toxic Carvin brand name. Doesn't matter the quality of instrument they offered, Carvin was an also-ran, at best. Their move towards an aggressive re-branding is the best idea they've had in literally decades. They've been making fairly bold moves, investing in headless and fanned-fret instruments, with premier (or "premier," however you like) finishes and colors, trying to make some room for the name that, frankly, Carvin never had, and never will/would.
The end of Carvin? If they play their cards right.
1. The Kiesel breakoff seems to have hurt Carvin as far as BASS guitars go. IMO
It's a common misconception that you can't get custom options in Kiesel/Carvin builds. If you want a MM pickup in a Kiesel bass, just supply them with it before the build. They will charge you extra, but that's to be expected, I guess.I personally think Carvins are great basses. I wanted a Bunny Brunel 4 string so bad, and by the time I could order one they quit making it. I ended up buying a used one and it turned out to be under 8 pounds and the best 4 string I've ever had. It was made during their 'crappy truss rod' era and I wanted to cry when I broke the truss rod. It still does fine but I wonder how long it will be before it becomes unplayable. Even though I love the Bunny I thought about another Carvin when it came time for another new bass. I don't care much for the Vanquish shape, and you can't get MM pickups in a Vanquish or Icon. Every LB70 I saw was close to 10 pounds so I gave up and bought a Roscoe instead.
If they would bring back the Bunny shape I'd be in trouble. I love my Roscoes, but that oiled neck on my Carvin is the shizzle. I have to steel wool my Roscoe neck every time I play it because of the stickiness.
I like to refer to that "bland" sound as "neutral"!I agree with most regarding great quality and features, but underwhelming sound. Most Carvin basses I've played were really well made and easy to play, but had bland sound. If you bought one and changed the pickups and preamp, you'd have and amazing bass.
Carvin tends to have trendy styles, and used ones tend to look very dated.
I think that the Carvin/Kiesel split is good for The guitars/bass operations. I think that adding a line of pickup options like Nordstrand, Aguilar, or Bart's would make their guitars more desirable.
It's a common misconception that you can't get custom options in Kiesel/Carvin builds. If you want a MM pickup in a Kiesel bass, just supply them with it before the build. They will charge you extra, but that's to be expected, I guess.
(I am not an endorsee or employee of Carvin or Kiesel Guitars) I was just there today picking up strings. I'm there once every 4-6 weeks. When I go in I scan all the basses and play a few. Today I played this one. First thing I noticed was the neck was thru body and was an exotic hardwood of some sort. The string spacing as (guessing) 17.5-18mm. This is a change from the usual 19 spacing on Carvin basses.
I have the original (narrow) spacing on my LB75 and it's the old Wilkinson bridge. Do you all know if there is a direct drop-in replacement for it? I know I'd have to use the top string loader since there are no ferrules in the body.'Narrow' spacing is actually standard on all Icons and LB's. Everything else (I think) is normal 19mm.
Vanquished...i like them even more! Hoping for a new 6-string Vader. .
1. The Kiesel breakoff seems to have hurt Carvin as far as BASS guitars go. IMO
2. Unusual bass styles no one has really taken to. IMO.
3. Instruments so good these days from everywhere that Carvin is not price competitive anymore.
4. But still pay US wages.
5. Poor reputation for amp failures.
6. So many quality boutique builders at competitive prices.
7. Incredible deals on all kinds of used instruments, way below Carvin prices.
8. I saw a poor instrument reveal video by the Kiesel son, which seemed unprofessional and desperate to me.
9. Carvin name is just not as powerful anymore.
It seems that until technology had caught up - that Carvin filled a real need. A quality American instrument, at below Fender prices with some customization. BACK IN THE DAY. Now, you can get what you want almost anywhere, and below Carvin prices for comparable quality or better.
I'm not too in tune with their guitar business, but I imagine that it's their pro audio gear and regular guitars that will keep them in business.