• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Instrument Cable that Really Sounds Better

Same here.

I recently posted about going through all my 1/4" cables using a measuring system that I use(d) for measurements on large PA systems.

I have all kinds of cables and I really expected to see some differences in them.

Nope, not really. Only the bad cable that probably had some unseen damage to it somewhere along the length.

Of course, I tossed it after removing the connectors. And the only 1/4" connectors I'll save are Switchcraft or Neutrik.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Drredplate
The 6' long ones sound clearer than the 24' long ones.

New ones always sound better than ones that have been packed & unpacked for hundreds of gigs & rehearsals.

A brand new 24'er will sound clearer than a 2-3 gigs/day, 4-6 days/week 3 year old 6'er.

A brand new 6'er will sound the clearest.

…but then we worry about having properly mellowed-out, broken-in strings, and maybe cutting highs with a "tone" knob or maybe boosting highs with an onboard preamp, but then maybe plugging into an an HPF+LPF pedal in front of an amp that almost definitely has HPF+LPF'ing baked in and plugged into a cab that also probably has HPF+LPF'ing baked in…

I will say, the clearest sounding instrument cables I've used were the cheapest available in the store, tested against Fender, Mogami, and Monster with a Telecaster into a Blues Jr and my Warwick Vette into some old Trace Elliot behemoth. The shop owner claimed that they were The Manufacturer for most of the known Cable Marketing Brands including Fender. I don't remember the brand name on the packaging. The plugs are Neutrik and the insulation only says "LOW NOISE SHIELDED INSTRUMENT CABLE - MADE IN U.S.A." on it. I bought a bunch and stashed them, and I've been on my last set since 2019. They were never so much better that I could hear it in the band mix, but if someone nerdy enough to have read this whole post knows the brand name and posts it, I'll probably go and buy a few more sets.
 
Last edited:
The 6' long ones sound clearer than the 24' long ones.

New ones always sound better than ones that have been packed & unpacked for hundreds of gigs & rehearsals.

A brand new 24'er will sound clearer than a 2-3 gigs/day, 4-6 days/week 3 year old 6'er.

A brand new 6'er will sound the clearest.
...

Interesting observations. Have you tested this on a scope? What frequencies start attenuating? How much is lost over what kinds of ranges? How soon does this degradation start to happen? If I handed you 3 otherwise identical cables, 1 brand new, 1 with 100 gigs on it and 1 with 1000 could you tell me which was which? Does the same happen with xlr? What about speakon? What about an IEC cable?

Not picking on you specifically man, but
Anecdotally people will tell you that they have. They are wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattZilla
After years of curiosity I finally got a Mogami Platinum cable last month. (What can I say; I like having nice things and apparently I hate having money.)
I haven't perceived any dramatic, or even discernible sonic difference thus far. The thickness does inspire confidence. Not enough to make me toss all my Canare cables. (Actually I think I prefer their handling; Platinum is a little stiff while Cordial feels soggy.)
I concur that "good" cable & connectors are worth it. (I don't see as much Switchcraft nowadays but G&H is worthy IME.)
Durability & reliability are major priorities for me, which is why I long ago dropped a certain brand that rhymes with: "Onster".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: kesslari
Have you tested this on a scope?
Nope. Just a 20-something's detail-developed ears really hoping that their expensive cables were better, or at least as-good as the cheapies.
How much is lost over what kinds of ranges?
the Crispy, the Punchy, and the Thuddy Ranges, in amounts pretty clearly hinted at in my post as Noticeable Solo But Completely Indistinguishable In A Mix.

How soon does this degradation start to happen?
"soon" implies time, but not physical wear inducing rollup-unroll cycles. These are wear items, which most people only throw away when they've worn to a state of uselessness.

Does the same happen with xlr?
Yes. Cycle any fine metal wires through being physically bent back & fourth thousands of times, they will eventually harden/embrittle and fail. Adding a third conductor grouping will not minimise the physical degradation to any great degree time-wise or physical-manipulation-cycle-wise.

They're just cables. They cost a fraction of the cost of a week's worth of store-bought basic protein requirement of an active adult.

My ellipsis-contained paragraph should be enough for anyone to glean that everything else in that post really means absolutely nothing in the medium picture of performing in any size ensemble.

A "best" cable is as important as a "best" type of clear paint on the body of your bass for good tone.

I'm not going to just do a one-sentence kinda-lie/kinda-truth and say "they're all the same", because, just like no physical objects ever actually touch as there is always difficult to measure atomic space between them, 1) there is a greater-than-zero difference between cables and 2) it doesn't matter to most people.

I don't know the OP. They might be even more obsessive than 23 year old me and really appreciate an accurate experience and the opportunity to deepen one of the fruitless rabbit holes in their collection of fruitless rabbit holes to explore.

It mattered to me in my 20s, it doesn't matter to me much now, but it still matters enough that, if I'm going to spend even just 5 of my hard-earned US Dollars, I'm gonna spend it on something that I can sorta kinda hear as being marginally better when playing solo at home or when recording my own little ditties.
 
Last edited:
A few things I keep in mind:
  • An active bass should be more impervious to cable degradation. With a passive bass more often than not I'm "degrading" the signal on purpose with my tone knob!
  • Lifetime warranty is a marketing gimmick. (I'd rather thrash a thing for decades then throw it out than have to exchange it every other year for the rest of my life.)
  • Online reviews are next-level unreliable.
  • If I have to really strain to perceive the tiniest bit more treble at home (which I maybe did once in the past), no one is going to notice that on the gig. When a cable starts crackling or cutting out, everyone is absolutely going to notice that!!
 
I was a believer in the 'a cable is a cable' theory until recently. I was noticing a loss of some top end but thought it was just strings getting broken in, or my new pedal setup. Went to my BL's place for a rehearsal and used his cable, and my top end was back. Went home and pulled my normal gigging cables out (Pig Hog and Fender Deluxe), which stay in my backpack and I never practice with. Compared them with my practice cables (Kirlin Deluxe) and they had quite a bit more top end. Feeling stupid for thinking 'a cable is a cable' for so long I ordered an expensive (to me) cable from Rattlesnake cables. It does seem to actually add a little low mid girth to my sound in addition to all the top end. I never thought I'd drop $40+ on a cable, but it does seem to help. Maybe not a huge difference over my $25-$30 gigging cables, but a huge difference from the $10-$15 budget cable. I roll off everything over 3.5k hz but the cheap cable was definitely taking away the top end I do use. The Rattlesnake is a much sturdier cable than the Fender or Pig Hog, so I consider it $ well spent. Considering how much we TB'ers spend on everything else that effects the tone, a good quality cable is a fairly cheap investment.
 
...I am a normal person.
:laugh: :roflmao: very cool! :thumbsup: same.

Have you ever used one that made a big sonic improvement, and blew you away?
nope. i've used crappy cables that sounded bad, but i've never used a cable that made me think i had to spend more money on them --- like @Drredplate, above.
 
Uh, yes. I don't understand your question. Are you asking if I hired someone to come in and help me test, or blindfolded myself when swapping out cables to see if the cheap cable was taking off high end? No, because I am a normal person.
That's fine. I'm a normal person too. Unfortunately, as normal people we are subject to things like confirmation bias, expectation bias, recall bias, information bias, and a few other things that make your experiences something that can't be relied on.

I'm not saying you couldn't tell a difference, I'm saying that the differences you heard might not have been caused by the cables themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bongomania
That's fine. I'm a normal person too. Unfortunately, as normal people we are subject to things like confirmation bias, expectation bias, recall bias, information bias, and a few other things that make your experiences something that can't be relied on.

I'm not saying you couldn't tell a difference, I'm saying that the differences you heard might not have been caused by the cables themselves.

I am pretty sure that when I mute my tuner, change a cable and 10 seconds later notice 2 cables are quite a bit different than 2 other cables with no other settings changed it's the cables.

After this experience, I was scrolling through TB and noticed this thread so thought I would respond to the OP. Different people in this thread said they've had cables that made things sound worse. By definition, if the reference point is starting with a worse cable, it is possible to have one sound better.

There is a sticky at the top of the Accessories sub forum by the great @bongomania. Instrument cables rated and compared. A buyers' guide! | TalkBass.com He does a much more scientific analysis than I did and there are definitely some differences in cables. Towards the end of the thread someone else posted an article where several pros compare different cables. A manufacturer I was shopping points out that his coiled cables tend to darken the tone a bit due to the longer length. He says it's not necessarily a bad thing if that's what you are going for, but wanted to be clear with his customers. Are all of these people full of crap? Are you the only honest person out there?

I went back through this thread and you seem to be the type of guy who makes the internet a bad place. You are convinced that there is no difference whatsoever in any cable, it doesn't matter if a cable is 5 feet or 50 feet, and anyone who says differently is a liar. I am 53 yrs old, have been playing for a long time and until a month or two ago thought it didn't make much difference, except for the fact that really long runs are bad, that's what XLR is for. But it was very noticeable when A/B'd back to back. I was wrong. I changed my priors. The one harboring biases appears to be you.
 
Last edited:
Hi @NorthTexasBass , there's quite a bit to unpack in your post here.

I went back through this thread and you seem to be the type of guy who makes the internet a bad place.
That's a real shame that you got that. I think that people who (probably unknowingly) spread misinformation, half-truths and even outright lies are the people who do that. For the record, I'm an educator. I spent most of my early career as a science teacher in secondary schools and now I do e-learning consultancy. I have also worked for the Institute of Physics and I have a volunteer post as an Ask for Evidence Ambassador for Sense About Science. If you [This invalid link has been removed], I'm the pin just west of Newcastle. Basically, I care a LOT about people being able to make informed decisions based on the facts. Look around the world today, the fact that 'fake news' and 'alternative facts' are even terms will tell you how much of a mess we're in. You will not find me this animated on a thread in the composition sub-forum because I am a decidedly average bass player. However, I am an excellent experimental designer.

When I taught I would ask my GCSE students to design an experiment to prove that those magnetic sports bracelets didn't work. The next lesson I would ask them to prove to me that they did. I also used to do the much-overused experiment of giving everyone in my class their horoscope, asking them to rate how accurate it was, and then revealing that everyone in the class has the same horoscope. This goes some way to proving that humans are superb at pattern-recognition. We see the things in the horoscope that apply to us and we disregard the bits that don't. It's why we can see shapes in clouds, hear ghosts in the wind, and it's why Instrument cables rated and compared. A buyers' guide! | TalkBass.com. Why does this happen? Because, as we all know, one of the most reliable (not) patterns in capitalism is that expensive = better. And I'm just saying that if you can actually be fooled into healing faster, then you can definitely be fooled into hearing a little extra bass in a cable.

To address that point:
I am pretty sure that when I mute my tuner, change a cable and 10 seconds later notice 2 cables are quite a bit different than 2 other cables with no other settings changed it's the cables.
I am telling you that that is NOT the case.

The fact that humans are fallible, squishy, unreliable, biased, messy creatures is why anecdotal evidence is treated as being essentially "trust me, bro". As I said in my post, I am absolutely not doubting that you heard a difference. But, at the moment, we don't know if that difference was actually being created by the cables or by your own psychology.

I can think of two ways to test that, there might be more. Firstly, you could use mechanical device to measure the properties of the cable. If me and you are looking at two different trees that both look taller than the other depending on where you stand, the way to settle that would be to use a tape measure and measure the trees. An oscilloscope would be able to tell you the frequency response, or you could do similar to @bongomania did and measure capacitance. The danger there is deciding what measurable differences on the scope are meaningful and noticeable by human ears. You could correctly argue that a cable that had -0.2dB at 50KHz is technically different from a cable that didn't, but then you also correctly argue that nobody could ever hear that difference.

The other thing that you could do would be what we call a double blind study. In this case you would not know which cable you were listening to. If you could reliably and statistically pick out which cable was which under those conditions then again we could be sure that the difference really was the cables rather than the psychology.

About the other bit:
You are convinced that there is no difference whatsoever in any cable, it doesn't matter if a cable is 5 feet or 50 feet, and anyone who says differently is a liar.

...

There is a sticky at the top of the Accessories sub forum by the great @bongomania. Instrument cables rated and compared. A buyers' guide! | TalkBass.com He does a much more scientific analysis than I did and there are definitely some differences in cables. Towards the end of the thread someone else posted an article where several pros compare different cables. A manufacturer I was shopping points out that his coiled cables tend to darken the tone a bit due to the longer length. He says it's not necessarily a bad thing if that's what you are going for, but wanted to be clear with his customers. Are all of these people full of crap? Are you the only honest person out there?

You're putting words in my mouth there. The original post asked if there was a "material difference ... that blew you away". That's what I responded to. And I maintain that the answer is 'no'. Yes, if you've got a faulty cable, or a cable that doesn't make proper connections with your jack (a trick that Monster used to use) or if you have a passive bass and you swap from a 1m cable to a 50m cable then of course you will notice a difference between cables. I was operating under good faith and I thought we were talking about broadly comparable cables from across brands. Perhaps I was wrong. Perhaps I should have written a 12000 word thesis as my first post, I thought my post was snappier though!

My actual thoughts on cables for anyone interested:
  • Cables are passive, they can't (by definition) add anything, only remove. If one of your cables has more treble then it's actually either got less bass, or your other cable has less treble.
  • Stick with as short as you can if your instrument is passive. Passive basses and true-bypass pedals have been responsible for many a frustrated musician.
  • Anything to to with time or phase alignment should set your alarm bells ringing.
  • Once you've bought cables with oversized jacks (at least Planet Waves and Monster used to do this, don't know if they still do) then going back to normal cables will sound worse as you'll have stretched the jack and it won't make good contact. Get some pliers and squeeze it back together.
  • It's no so bad with musicians as we're a pretty educated bunch on the whole, but hifi and audiophile cables are a massive pile of snake oil. Stay away.
  • Cables are two jacks with some copper between. Just make your own. Or don't. I buy Thomann own brand as they're cheaper than making my own. Are they holding my tone back? Nah. Like I said I'm a decidedly average bass player.
 
Last edited:
If one of your cables has more treble then it's actually either got less bass
there is a correlation there with that and wire degradation and with wire length (and thus capacitance).

With enough time on TB you'll find threads where it's mentioned that someone listened to a field recording of their gig and the soundguy managed to make their Precision sound like a StingRay and vice a versa. Obviously, the answer to "blew you away" is going to be "no", but the answer to "really (often times poor English for "in reality") sounds better" will be the same type of yes as "can you really hear a difference between EMG GZR pickups and SD Quarter Pounder pickups?"

It seems you've intentionally or unintentionally started poking out something like the "what is 'quality'?" thought exercise.

———

For some people, a steak is a steak is a steak. If it's dark brown on the outside and a pinkish light brown on the inside, they'll cover it in seasoning and sauce, eat it and move on with life while rolling their eyes at people who buy their meat at a local butcher and take pride in knowing and exercising multiple cooking techniques to illicit different specific flavor profiles without or before seasoning/sauce.

There are other people who can taste differences in different types of salt and maintain stock of at least three types in their kitchen.

With regard to cables, you are the former type. It's good to know yourself. Congratulations on this making this step in life. Enjoy your cables which are nearly the lowest on the list of components that don't not affect the voicing profile of the electric bass guitar system instrument.

The tone of all of your typed sentences in this thread does leave a taste of you trying to authoritatively coerce others into acknowledge your personal experience Zero Difference between cables as the only possible real experience.

Are you fully retired from teaching and in need of the thrilling feeling of sculpting other people's minds?