I didn't. How would I even do that?You didn't alter the front edge of the E nut slot by any chance when widening it. Can throw things off
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I didn't. How would I even do that?You didn't alter the front edge of the E nut slot by any chance when widening it. Can throw things off
what did you widen the nut slot with?I didn't. How would I even do that?
Is it the long-scale version?I noticed bigger strings require more length.
I'm still trying to intonate the E string from the Labella 1954s. It keeps going sharp. The saddle is pushed back a lot, the spring is all bunched up and I may have to shorten it. The other 3 intonated to almost the same length and way shorter than the E. Very strange.
Long scale. Its hard to bend the E over the saddle. There's enough room to intonate. It just seem to shift every few days. I'll take it off and put it back on just in case. Btw the other 3 are a bit sharp now. And the neck needs more relief (yes, not less).Is it the long-scale version?
There have been reporting of the short-scale 110 being problematic:
https://www.talkbass.com/posts/23083840/
(No mention of it alone being significantly far from the other three though.)
Have you tried removing the spring entirely?
I noticed bigger strings require more length.
I'm still trying to intonate the E string from the Labella 1954s. It keeps going sharp. The saddle is pushed back a lot, the spring is all bunched up and I may have to shorten it. The other 3 intonated to almost the same length and way shorter than the E. Very strange.


...posts by Dr. Kemp of St. Andrew's University, Scotland.
Thanks for reinforcing the difference between tension and flexibility.Of course, the way this sounds is part of our bass tone culture and many people like it. But I was happy to understand this and move toward more flexible strings (speaking of the internal construction, not the tension).
Ok, good luck!![]()
Is that why the E string in my Labella Jamerson set always sounds hollow and sharp despite registering in tune? It's especially evident at the 10th fretBut we have other threads, from about four years ago, that talked about the problem of string stiffness generally (not just the core) causing higher harmonics to go sharp. It's long-established science.
![]()
To be fair, I hear the same weird tone quality with other flats (Fenders and Chromes) but to a lesser degree, plus those Es are 100 gauge, not 110 (and the Jamersons have thicker cores than the other Labellas, apparently).@andare, I'm not sure what descriptive words to use, but yes. And you can see it with a good tuner.
iStrobosoft has a plugin - I don't remember the name - that shows multiples of the fundamental in the columns.
Funny, the first bass strings I ever bought - after reading a lot on Talkbass- were short scale Jamerson's, 760M-S. I wasn't happy with them after a while, and that led me on a long journey.