• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is a fretless necessary? Poll

Is a Fretless Necessary?

  • I own a fretless. Wouldn't be without one.

    Votes: 219 66.6%
  • No need for a fretless.

    Votes: 110 33.4%

  • Total voters
    329
i pretty much played only fretless for a good year but since i got my Fodera it is all that gets the play, although i do have a rather nice fretless in the works right now that should be done around february time, so i will be playing a lot more fretless when that bass turns up.


Dave
 
I own 2 (jazz & abg) and would be without at least one.

You may not NEED it today, but I'm willing to bet if you had one you could find plenty of uses for it and eventually reecognize the need to own one. Tight on money? Look at the new Squire fretless jazz or look for a used MIM.
 
I would find a cheap one to try it out and see (I started with a Yamaha and it was great). Like mentioned above, its harder than it looks. Of course, I went crazy and eventually went DB. But fretless is a "style" that works if it fits with the music you are playing.

Oh, and before the debate starts on lined or lineless: 1 vote for lineless.:ninja:
 
If anything, I think frets are superfluous. I seldom play my fretted bass because I find fretless much more expressive and versatile. I play fretless in rock, prog, jazz, and R&B, and it fits in very well with each genre. Once you get the technique down, you can make a fretless bass sound fretted (more or less), but getting that singing legato fretless tone from a fretted bass is almost impossible.
 
If you play a really wide range of music with a wide range of people, it's better to have something and not need it, then to get a call about needing a fretless sound on a tune and not have one.
That's the issue. I play rock in my current band. I can't see playing a fretless in that band, but if a fretless would make me a better player ( or if it made you a better player) then it would be worth the investment. And I think I would have to go lined.
And I'm surprised that the poll #'s are 37 to 12 in favor of owning a fretless. I really thought it would be much less.
 
I don't think it's any more necessary than a fretted bass. I don't have to have one. But if I only had one, it would be fretless. Currently two out of three of mine are fretless (3/4 if you count the DB) - my fretted Jazz is my most recent acquisition.

The way you (appropriately) phrased the question made me vote for option #1.
 
That's the issue. I play rock in my current band. I can't see playing a fretless in that band, but if a fretless would make me a better player ( or if it made you a better player) then it would be worth the investment. And I think I would have to go lined.
And I'm surprised that the poll #'s are 37 to 12 in favor of owning a fretless. I really thought it would be much less.

I think playing a fretless does improve your fretted playing a little, especially if you play by ear a lot or are not super accurate with finger placement on a fretted. My improv skills took a huge jump after i got my fretless for no apparent reason, but it could have been that I'm hearing/listening to notes much more precisely now since i have to hear myself being out of tune all the time lol. You never know when you can use a fretless in a rock song. Look at Tony Franklin, Jack Bruce, and Jeff Ament. All rockers that bust out the fretless.
 
That's the issue. I play rock in my current band. I can't see playing a fretless in that band, but if a fretless would make me a better player ( or if it made you a better player) then it would be worth the investment.
Hmmm....
This guy was in a successful rock band and used fretless:
fburell.jpg


Here's a 5 string fretless in the show:
 

Latest posts