• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is adhering to the kick drum pattern admired?

So, I love all the standard bassists everyone admires here on talkbass. You know-John Paul Jones, James Jamerson, etc. However, whenever I hear their music, the one thing that catches me, (and really, any music) apart from their musicality, is the punch-even through headphones-of when the kick and bass match up. It really is something. I also like, when the bassist mimics the pattern of the drums, playing low notes for the kick and maybe a high note for the snare, whilst matching the cymbal sustain. However, quite a few people say that this rigid pocket is often a signature of a novice bassist, but I think it really confirms the purpose of the bass as a bridge between the drums and guitars (rhythm and harmony). It also keeps your playing simplistic. However, I don’t want to be recognised as boring. I just feel it lets the music breath a lot more. Do you think I’m okay having this aspiration or not?

Put it this way: My one constant goal is to make the kick and the bass sound like one instrument. If anybody I play with thinks that’s boring, they haven’t mentioned it yet. :D
 
So, I love all the standard bassists everyone admires here on talkbass. You know-John Paul Jones, James Jamerson, etc. However, whenever I hear their music, the one thing that catches me, (and really, any music) apart from their musicality, is the punch-even through headphones-of when the kick and bass match up. It really is something. I also like, when the bassist mimics the pattern of the drums, playing low notes for the kick and maybe a high note for the snare, whilst matching the cymbal sustain. However, quite a few people say that this rigid pocket is often a signature of a novice bassist, but I think it really confirms the purpose of the bass as a bridge between the drums and guitars (rhythm and harmony). It also keeps your playing simplistic. However, I don’t want to be recognised as boring. I just feel it lets the music breath a lot more. Do you think I’m okay having this aspiration or not?
Playing well is admired. For as many tracks you can site where the bass is rhythmically playing what the kick drum is there are that many where it’s not. Listen to James Brown.
 
Last edited:
I’ve enjoyed reading this thread as I’ve often found myself confused as to what “the pocket” is an isn’t. What about songs like “With a Little Help From My Friends” or “What is And What Should Never Be”?....are Paul and John Paul really paying attention to the drum part or are the rules different when you’re laying your part down in the studio (in other words, is “the pocket” more of a requirement when playing live)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pbassmanca
Put it this way: My one constant goal is to make the kick and the bass sound like one instrument. If anybody I play with thinks that’s boring, they haven’t mentioned it yet. :D
Yeah, but they really don't care what you think. They just care that you're staying out of their way at all times.
 
I love a good pattern

image7.png
 
The best example of tightly locked in with the drummer is Ian Hill of Judas Priest. Not a style for everything but in their case contributes heavily in their signature sound. He has always been under rated as a bassist but the more I dig into what he is playing my level of respect has grown tremendously. While I usually lock in with a drummer I do deviate here and there. How much or how little is a personal thing.
 
and it works the other way around: some drummers are oblivious to the bass. some drummers struggle to groove. some drummers don't have the skill to sort out a good pattern for a given rendition.

You hit the nail squarely on the head. I play with a number of different drummers on a regular basis and most of them are oblivious to give a repeating pattern on the kick that the bass player can lock in with and it's not that the bass player must lock in on every note but the drummer should yield patterns that are repeatable and most of them these days don't I used to spend a lot of time chasing them but I decided against that I don't even bother now.


Occasionally I'll set in with a drummer that knows what he's doing and gives a repeatable kick pattern that I can lock in and that's when the magic happens and it's like I said not that we have to be locked all the time but sometime.
 
So, I love all the standard bassists everyone admires here on talkbass. You know-John Paul Jones, James Jamerson, etc. However, whenever I hear their music, the one thing that catches me, (and really, any music) apart from their musicality, is the punch-even through headphones-of when the kick and bass match up. It really is something. I also like, when the bassist mimics the pattern of the drums, playing low notes for the kick and maybe a high note for the snare, whilst matching the cymbal sustain. However, quite a few people say that this rigid pocket is often a signature of a novice bassist, but I think it really confirms the purpose of the bass as a bridge between the drums and guitars (rhythm and harmony). It also keeps your playing simplistic. However, I don’t want to be recognised as boring. I just feel it lets the music breath a lot more. Do you think I’m okay having this aspiration or not?
Probably the most important thing to remember is "It's the ONE!". Don't ever lose that or you will get lost. Personally I think that syncing up with the drummer's actual beats can be extremely effective in adding drive to particular parts of a song. I don't know that I really want that much drive all the time as it is limits the dynamics and musicality of the song, but it really adds drive and contrast when you plan out where you want it to match.

Honestly though, a good drummer will be more of an instigator in matching up his drumming and your patterns at the right time. It always makes me smile when my drummer does that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Groove Doctor
Sometimes it works to be with the bass drum, and sometimes it works to plow right through it and ignore it. I can name you dozens of great examples of each approach.

As for this idea "Let the guitarist do the shredding," yeah, bass players should never have any fun, never stand out in any way, shape or form, they should stand at the back of the stage with their back turned, and preferably wear all black so nobody sees them.
Right. :woot:
 
there's countless classic country songs where the bass follows the kick drum playing root-fifth, root-fifth, root-fifth, then a little walk up to the next chord to do the same thing on that chord and so on. it's basic, simple, is all a lot of these songs call for and it sounds great. don't ever get the mind set that something has to be technically challenging to be good.
 
Yeah, but they really don't care what you think. They just care that you're staying out of their way at all times.

I do stay out of their way. That's my job. As my tag says, "I'm not an artist, I'm in the service business." (And I actually do play in quite a few places where the bass drum doesn't.) As I've posted elsewhere, and I suspect you might agree, I don't want to be told I'm a great bass player. I want to be told the band sounded great and everybody had a real good time.
 
I’ve enjoyed reading this thread as I’ve often found myself confused as to what “the pocket” is an isn’t. What about songs like “With a Little Help From My Friends” or “What is And What Should Never Be”?....are Paul and John Paul really paying attention to the drum part or are the rules different when you’re laying your part down in the studio (in other words, is “the pocket” more of a requirement when playing live)?
Pocket is the first requirement to be kept at all times. Locking in with drums doesn’t mean that you mimic the kick drum pattern though.
 
BTW, I really hate that phrase "locked in." That implies only playing when the bass drum plays, and who the hell does that at all times every time? I prefer the phrase "keeping good time."
Is that what it implies? I always understood it to mean that regardless of whether you’re playing the same rhythmic pattern or not you were both on the same pulse and in sync. Having good time is not synonymous with having good feel. I know lots of guys who can effortlessly play with a metronome but can’t groove their way out of a bucket.
 
So, I love all the standard bassists everyone admires here on talkbass. You know-John Paul Jones, James Jamerson, etc. However, whenever I hear their music, the one thing that catches me, (and really, any music) apart from their musicality, is the punch-even through headphones-of when the kick and bass match up. It really is something. I also like, when the bassist mimics the pattern of the drums, playing low notes for the kick and maybe a high note for the snare, whilst matching the cymbal sustain. However, quite a few people say that this rigid pocket is often a signature of a novice bassist, but I think it really confirms the purpose of the bass as a bridge between the drums and guitars (rhythm and harmony). It also keeps your playing simplistic. However, I don’t want to be recognised as boring. I just feel it lets the music breath a lot more. Do you think I’m okay having this aspiration or not?
Yeah man, I mean signature bass lines with syncopated rhythms set aside, for 90% of what we do, if you stick with the kick and make sure to hit the right changes, nobody will complain about what you do. :cool: