• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is it considered bad technique to clank?

I have a (possibly dumb) question. I'm pretty new to bass (but practicing diligently) and I've been trying to decide on right hand plucking technique. I find that when my hand is down closer to the body of the bass and I'm floating my thumb - that is the most comfortable on my wrist and I can mute the strings the best BUT I get more clank that way (my guess is that is because I'm plucking more up/down rather than from the side?) -- now if I anchor my thumb on the pickup and/or move my anchor, my hand is higher and I get less clank (and I think I can do 16th notes faster) but I can't keep as many strings muted and wrist position isn't as ideal (my wrists are old). Anyway - my question is, does the angle you pluck the string make a difference in clank as it seems to for me?
 
I have a (possibly dumb) question. I'm pretty new to bass (but practicing diligently) and I've been trying to decide on right hand plucking technique. I find that when my hand is down closer to the body of the bass and I'm floating my thumb - that is the most comfortable on my wrist and I can mute the strings the best BUT I get more clank that way (my guess is that is because I'm plucking more up/down rather than from the side?) -- now if I anchor my thumb on the pickup and/or move my anchor, my hand is higher and I get less clank (and I think I can do 16th notes faster) but I can't keep as many strings muted and wrist position isn't as ideal (my wrists are old). Anyway - my question is, does the angle you pluck the string make a difference in clank as it seems to for me?

That would make sense. The vibration of the string when attacked from different angles will (or won't) send it towards the frets, where clank lives.

Good on you for being diligent! I was never a huge stickler for technique, I just wanted to get the sounds out that I wanted to hear. Some would poopoo on that but I think it's important to stay loose and be able to get a variety of sounds. I mean like the "I always anchor my thumb on the bridge pickup, ALWAYS" guys (not that it's bad for them) I just can't get behind that for me.

Basically I try to be Bobby Vega, the end.
 
You know, if you hit a note with a certain fervor you get a thump, but if you hit it with a bit more fervor you get a clank. Is that clank considered bad technique, or can you clank as long as you're consistent as to when you clank in a given bassline?
Clank is a technique.

Now that I've been playing a long time, when I play with a clanky sound, it's because I'm doing it deliberately. It's a useful sound to have in my sonic arsenal.

This is a good point, but though I like to write rock bass lines I am not quite to the clank end of the rock spectrum.
Not even like Geezer Butler or JPJ clank?

Not at all. Bryan Beller does it well.



This "chime" tone he gets is pretty much my dream tone

Fantastic player and awesome tone he has there.
 
Clank is only bad technique if you are aiming for no clank (within reason). Plenty of guys use clank to their advantage. Mind you, they are primarily rock and metal players. Most jazz cats are anti-clank.

This.

As long as it's intended, there's nothing wrong with it, just another 'flavour'.

When I was learning at first I used to play by myself a lot, no drum machine or anything, and without realising it I developed a style with a lot of percussive elements. It was a bitch to train myself out of adding those elements automatically when playing with others. That was *bad*. Sometimes I want to add them, sometimes I don't. As long as you're in control and you do what you intend to do, then that's fine. When things just 'happen' regardless of your intention... then that's something you need to pay attention to and control it.
 
You know, if you hit a note with a certain fervor you get a thump, but if you hit it with a bit more fervor you get a clank. Is that clank considered bad technique, or can you clank as long as you're consistent as to when you clank in a given bassline?
It is only bad if it doesn't belong there, or if you can't control it.
For many bass players a sharp attack is integral to their distinctive sound, but it doesn't show up everywhere.
As a player, it is a tool that you need know when to turn on and off. If you do it in the wrong place it looks amateurish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcnach and pcake
To help dial OUT clank (besides technique), I like basses with a passive roll off tone control. Very different than just treble knob of a preamp.

That said, I like clank at points as well, but as others have said, to be able to control when and when is the key. Until you are there, keep working at it.
 
*Clank* is a tone that a LOT of the metal finger players use because it's what pushes the bass out in the mix to make us heard. It's a HUGE part of most metal bassists tone. You have to play aggressive to get it, so it takes some time to learn how to use it and not be all over the place. Solo it might sound like trash but in the mix it's pretty prominent and can really help with a wall of tone that helps connect the drums to the guitars.
 
Who? Can you share a youtube clip as an example?
Fieldy's tone is ALL clank. He doesn't even consider himself a bass player. He's basically all clicks and percussive sounds. He's the bass player for Korn. Just google/youtube search him. Vids are everywhere.
He gets a bad rap for being a poopy bassist, but for Korn, it's the exact tone that helps make their sound theirs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NortyFiner
Not at all. Bryan Beller does it well.



This "chime" tone he gets is pretty much my dream tone


I don't do metal anymore, and I've never watched an episode of Dethklok, but I'm really impressed with this guy's ability to teach. There are lots of gifted bass players out there, but not a lot of them really know how to teach.