• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is it so difficult to put a bridge in the right place?

I'll have to disagree with some of you. My Yamaha 5 is perfectly aligned with the dots. My Stingray 5 was too. I've have several Fender 5s, none of them lined up. It should line up. IMO of course.
20230819_163424.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zooberwerx
I'll have to disagree with some of you. My Yamaha 5 is perfectly aligned with the dots. My Stingray 5 was too. I've have several Fender 5s, none of them lined up. It should line up. IMO of course.
View attachment 7376151
Your strings are not centered on the neck. The gaps between the neck edges and B and G strings are asymmetrical, i.e. the B string sits closer to the edge than the G string. Some people like that, some don't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gracie and RomanS
This is becoming a real pet peeve of mine. After reading @jazzbass_5 's post about his crooked bridge, I thought I'd let off some steam. Three out of four of my 5-string basses have bridges that are not aligned with the centerline of the neck. I want to see the A-string go through the CENTER of the frickin' dots!

Sadowsky MetroExpress J/J
View attachment 7376037

Sadowsky MetroLine P/J
View attachment 7376040

Fender American Professional II Precision V

View attachment 7376041

Dingwall SP1 - at least they know how to do it
View attachment 7376043
Mayday ....mayday.....Roger Sadowsky....... Mayday
 
I'll have to disagree with some of you. My Yamaha 5 is perfectly aligned with the dots. My Stingray 5 was too. I've have several Fender 5s, none of them lined up. It should line up. IMO of course.
View attachment 7376151

Look at your intra-string spacing B>E & E>A and compare to D>G (...at the nut). Some people find this bothersome, more so when you have narrow nut width and / or spacing. No right or wrong...I see it both ways.

Riis
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabbler
You came in a little hot on the subject but... it's not a stupid question!

This has been discussed in Luthier's Corner a few times. The responses from experienced builders taught me a lot.


I use a slightly different method on the nut with progressively closer spacing as the strings get smaller. So 11mm B-E, 10.5mm E-A, etc. My D string is never in the middle of the nut, though it is in the middle of the bridge. My solution for dots has been to install them at a slight angle going up the fretboard so that they align directly under the D string. One customer replaced his nut and the luthier used different spacing and then he told me my dots were crooked. :smug:
 
A lot of Fender Jazzes are a little off, but it's not usually the bridge, it's usually the neck has just shifted a bit. You can fix this by loosening the joint and knocking it over a bit, then re-tightening. Usually it's off a bit on the G string, placing the string a little closer to the edge of the fretboard. Not a big deal. Unless you pull on your strings a lot while fretting you won't even notice it.
I would do this. Just barely loosen the neck screws and yank it over. I have read that doing this under string tension also seats the neck heel in the neck pocket better and have found this to be the case on my one and only bolt on bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Phreaky Phriday
I would do this. Just barely loosen the neck screws and yank it over. I have read that doing this under string tension also seats the neck heel in the neck pocket better and have found this to be the case on my one and only bolt on bass.
That doesn't work if the neck is tight in the pocket. It may also crack the finish as the finish is brittle compared to everything else. It can work if the neck pocket is loose enough and if the neck is truly out of alignment, but I don't think that's an issue here.
 
I’m not really taking sides on the
issue(s) at hand, but I think, for a
factory bass, EBMM did a good job.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3957.jpeg
    IMG_3957.jpeg
    1.8 MB · Views: 14
  • IMG_3958.jpeg
    IMG_3958.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3959.jpeg
    IMG_3959.jpeg
    1.6 MB · Views: 15
  • IMG_3960.jpeg
    IMG_3960.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 16
  • IMG_3961.jpeg
    IMG_3961.jpeg
    1.8 MB · Views: 16
  • Like
Reactions: EricOnTheBass
That would be wrong. Strings are not evenly spaced centre-to-centre on the neck. Because the strings are a graduated thickness, to keep the feel of the spacing between the strings even the nut has graduated spacing, the consequence of which is that the A string is shifter slightly to the tight of the neck's centre line. The look of it bothers lots of folks, so you are not alone. I think the builders ought to consider centring the dots under the A string, but then some OCD people will complain that the neck looks lop-sided.
A simple solution could be fret markers that aren’t dots. Blocks, parallellograms Rick-style sharkfins etc.
 
So that's the location of the confounded bridge!!
It's supposed to come after the second chorus
Also OP - how about sending your question to Ernie Ball/Music Man regarding their 5 string necks with the G snugly nestled up right to the fretboard edge?!

I wish more bridges had adjustable saddle spacing, as long as the nut is spaced correctly you can fix any bridge spacing issues yourself.
 
Last edited:
Re the first two basses shown above: Ignore the dots and look at the strings, The B and G strings seem to be in perfect alignment with the edges of the finger board, so that suggests to me that the bridges have been installed correctly.
Except that you can plainly see that they aren't. They look aligned near the nut, but the discrepancy builds linearly over the length of the neck. The G string is 20-30% closer to the edge of the fretboard than the B string is if you look near the neck pocket. The bridge is too close to the treble side.

IMO the issue with this isn't the aesthetics but the playability. My fingers expect the strings to be evenly spaced, and the edge of the fretboard is part of how my brain indexes for that. On the extreme end, you can have issues with strings slipping off the fretboard... that's the reason I got rid of my Squier VI, because the high e string was so close to the edge of the fretboard that it was not hard to make the string slip off the fretboard entirely.
 
Except that you can plainly see that they aren't. They look aligned near the nut, but the discrepancy builds linearly over the length of the neck. The G string is 20-30% closer to the edge of the fretboard than the B string is if you look near the neck pocket. The bridge is too close to the treble side.

IMO the issue with this isn't the aesthetics but the playability. My fingers expect the strings to be evenly spaced, and the edge of the fretboard is part of how my brain indexes for that. On the extreme end, you can have issues with strings slipping off the fretboard... that's the reason I got rid of my Squier VI, because the high e string was so close to the edge of the fretboard that it was not hard to make the string slip off the fretboard entirely.
You must be looking at entirely different basses than the ones I'm referring to. I don't see any problem at all with the basses shown in the first post.
 
So that's the location of the confounded bridge!!

Also OP - how about sending your question to Ernie Ball/Music Man regarding their 5 string necks with the G snugly nestled up right to the fretboard edge?!

I wish more bridges had adjustable saddle spacing, as long as the nut is spaced correctly you can fix any bridge spacing issues yourself.
I'm looking at a photo of the StingRay Special 5 I stupidly sold. Looks like it's set up with equal-center spacing rather than equal gap spacing, which explains why the A-string is nicely aligned with the dots.

Screenshot 2025-11-25 at 7.58.15 PM.png