TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I am particularly fond of Buddy Guy as a performer. One of his trademarks is how he does a killer guitar solo - he brings the band down to almost a whisper and plays a gut-wrenching solo so quitely. You hear every note, every nuance - it slays the audience. It’s far more emotionally powerful than the screaming leads you most often hear.
There’s a lot of value in lower volumes.
I would guess kids these days don't do that, mostly because they don't have garages to play in anymore.There's a reason kids play loud when they're starting out.
Quoth my bandmate's dad when we were forming our first band as tweens: "you guys aren't any good, but you're loud."
Hahahahaha that’s too funnyI agree too.
Moderate to low volume is the best. Yes, it’s so nice to be able hear everyone clearly and distinctly. Too many times I used to come home feeling like I’d been in a rumble when everyone was playing at coliseum level in the garage.
I agree with that comment. At your group practice location is NOT the place to initially learn a song. It brings things to a grinding halt and wastes (for those who learned it at home) everyone's time. Sure, you all work out little stuff when you try a new song. I see the OP argument for playing quieter. But, I also have noticed that when someone doesn't know their part, they play quieter. It shows who isn't confident in their part or who hasn't done their homework.95% of the time I learn my parts on my own, not in a group setting. Since this is the way our works, There is no time waisted for somebody (s) to learn their part. When I get to practice I have a pretty good idea how I’m going to play it. Rehearsals are recorded. After review, I’ll refine my parts as needed. Historically volume is not a problem.
IMHO I agree partly. My approach is to fill the dance floor with sound not the building. If the people want to hear the group louder they will sit closer. I have the equipment to rock almost any club or event hall, but I never push my amp hard.From a marketing viewpoint: You want to be loud enough to move dancers, but not so loud that bartenders can't hear even shouted drink orders. What truly mystifies me are the places that have deafening house sound. There are a few places where even though the house sound is free, we bring our own PA and our own soundperson. Which costs us. But that's how strongly we feel about it: Saving venues from themselves. It's a freaky world, and gettin' freakier all the time.
I don't see that consistently, but I would be one who's guilty of that.And yet: The minimum amp wattage for gig according to TB amp recommendation threads is 500 watt.
It takes musical maturity to realize and internalize this.I am particularly fond of Buddy Guy as a performer. One of his trademarks is how he does a killer guitar solo - he brings the band down to almost a whisper and plays a gut-wrenching solo so quitely. You hear every note, every nuance - it slays the audience. It’s far more emotionally powerful than the screaming leads you most often hear.
There’s a lot of value in lower volumes.
^^^^ This, this and more this. ^^^^95% of the time I learn my parts on my own, not in a group setting. Since this is the way our works, There is no time waisted for somebody (s) to learn their part. When I get to practice I have a pretty good idea how I’m going to play it. Rehearsals are recorded. After review, I’ll refine my parts as needed. Historically volume is not a problem.