• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is my lead singer that bad?

He does have one issue - He can't sing!

Way too much vibrato, but more importantly, he can't sing on pitch - kind of important for a singer.

Yeah, he's terrible. He's got a long way to go to becoming a decent singer. Do you have a few years to spare while holding his hand?

If not, look elsewhere.

Exactly.

I only got through about 25 seconds of the video. His pitch and vocal control is horrible. A bad monitor mix can make singing difficult, but most pro vocalists can compensate by paying extra attention to their head voice to get through. Sometimes they may be a little flat or sharp, but it's obvious that they can sing. It's obvious that this guy can't sing, regardless of monitor mix or having a bad gig or having a cold or not being warmed up or whatever. He just lacks any type of vocal technique or ear.

However, I do agree with those here who say that it's in bad taste to post up an unsolicated video of your singer.

Does that me I'm condoning it by responding? :confused:
 
Bono's an awesome singer. Almost always dead-on with the pitch and phrasing, and really knows how to sell a band onstage.

You feel that way - and I feel different. I think he can sing well, and can perform (kinda hard to doubt that). Without hating on him the best I can say is he 'doesn't do it for me'.

If somebody like he ability-wise wanted a bassist and I got an offer I'd take it. Good but I just don't see the 'wow' bit - like I do in many other groups of varying levels of success.
 
If you're trying to get somewhere with your band, your singer really needs to shine. Most non-musicians will judge your entire band based on the vocals. The hard truth,imo, is you shouldn't have made a C.D. with this singer. You're giving your seal of approval on someone who simply doesn't deserve it and it compromises your integrity(if your trying to be a pro band). I'm giving my opinion because one of my "flaws" over the years(repeatedly) was hoping,wishing,wanting to see what I thought was potential in singers and it didn't ever bare fruit. If you're in your early teens and just starting out , that's fine. That's not the case here. In my experiences, my first impression was always correct. I , like you, would try and see some sort of glimmer of hope and buy into all the excuses as to why they weren't that good and I'd hope that with time they'd get to where they needed to be. Huge mistake on my part and I did it repeatedly. You have to take musicians/singers at face value. If they have it, fine. If not , you have to keep in mind that you'll most likely waste months or years only to realise that your first impressions where correct. Wanna guess how that feels ? If you can play in tune, shouldn't you play in a band with a singer that can ? After about a half dozen times and decades later, you'll wish you had that ability to see through the b.s. Trust me on that. All the excuses as to why he hasn't become a good singer really shouldn't matter to you. The fact is he hasn't and your time is extremely valuable (or it flippin' should be !). All musical decisions should take priority. I hope this helps and keep in mind that there is always time to correct a personel change even if it takes months. Be strong, bro.

Perfectly stated.

My band hired a new singer at the beginning of the year. My guitarist, drummer, and I are all vets with lots of stage time. Our singer had sung in previous bands but was much more green compared to us. However, we knew he was a helluva singer and didn't have any attitude. We were willing to work with him despite the experience gap, and it was a good move on our part. He's really stepped up his game.

However, he already pretty much had the goods when we hired him. He just needs a little direction now and again. That's different than somebody who steps in with major flaws and you hope, as Sessions says, that they'll eventually grow. As this point in my life and music career, I just don't have the patience to take on somebody who isn't an A-lister (or at least has serious A-lister potential like our singer). I was green too at one point, as was everyone on this board. However, before I joined my first serious band, I still made sure I knew how to play well. If I were the bass equivalent of the singer in the original post, I wouldn't have even tried out for a band until I had a suitable amount of chops.

The problem, though, is that many people are bad who don't know they're bad. About a year ago, I read a psychology journal article that looked at metacognition and how it related to critiquing one's own performance. The investigators found that as your skills at a task become better, your ability to objectively critique your own performance of the task becomes better. However, people with low ability don't have the necessary metacognitive skills to critique their own ability. In other words, people who suck often suck too much to realize that they suck.
 
What's interesting is that now we're talking about sucky singers in famous bands. The differences between U2, Dream Theater...or in my opinion...lungfish, shellac, or many other indie screamo acts...is the presentation of crappy vocals. This guy has no presentation and crappy vocals. That's the difference.
 
I agree with a lot of what you're saying here, Jimmy. But I do have to take issue with this:

Perry Farrell, Anthony Kiedis, Axl Rose, Brian Johnson, Steven Tyler (though he got better once he got off drugs)

While I love each and everyone of those singer's bands, Steven Tyler is the only one I'd really consider a technically good vocalist. Rose has an impressive range, but the timbre of his voice is an acquired taste. Farrell and Kiedis are pitchy on their recordings! My point is that it's not at all surprising that these world famous vocalists have had some bad performances. They aren't really technically great to begin with (sorry about ending the sentence with a preposition, Munji).

Each one of those vocalists has something very unique and special that shines within the context of their given bands. But if I were hiring a singer for any given project, not considering their current star status, it's very possible that I wouldn't hire any of them.
 
Dylan doesn't sound "pretty" but at least he can carry a tune and has some talent.

All you guys complaining about the "fire him" culture here on TB... you're failing to acknowledge that there are times when "fire him" is the correct course. I'm not saying that's the right course here (although I would lean that way), but c'mon... sometimes it's the right thing to do.
 
He sounds fine on the recordings. He sounds terrible on the live video.

So what's different?

My guess is:

1) He's over excited/nervous for live shows

2) He can't hear himself

3) He's straining because he can't hear himself.

All correctable IMO.
 
Dylan doesn't sound "pretty" but at least he can carry a tune and has some talent.

All you guys complaining about the "fire him" culture here on TB... you're failing to acknowledge that there are times when "fire him" is the correct course. I'm not saying that's the right course here (although I would lean that way), but c'mon... sometimes it's the right thing to do.
Firing should be a last resort. Everyone on here makes it the first resort.
 
I'm not saying fire him, but there are arguments that say going down the "keep" road will have hurdles and may or may not ever pan out. And there are arguments saying "cut your losses now" and find the appropriate replacement. Both have merit really. Music is a double edged sword. It's about fun and fun with those you surround yourself with. Then you cross that line of "We're going for it" and all deals are off.

Which side of the sword are you on? This may help your decision.
 
If you are driven to reach the top of the heap, all your members must have the same drive. They all need to be equally strong and dependant on one another.

No drugs. Period. No excuses.
Alcohol abuse not tolerated.
Get rid of that ugly hat!
He can't sing. Just can't sing.

I remember one year we had a band and were told to get a front singer. We auditioned more than a dozen singers. When we were about to give up hope, Ms. Right came in and blew us away. When she sang a song, we all went WOW!!!!!! And she had Presence.

I agree with other posters, this guy may have issues beyond your band, but this is your business. He needs to take a break and take some lessons, get some therapy, and get over the medicinal use. You need to hold a very big audition for vocalists. And don't settle. Who knows, maybe someone in your band can sing well and no one knows it. That's what happened with Phil Collins and Genesis!

It is not your job to provide counselling or rehabilitation to people. Your job is to get the very best band together and shoot for the stars. Remember, people will look at your singer first, and believe me, he was not impressing.

Even beyond that, the fact that no one on this post went, "WOW THAT GUY IS AWESOME! or WOW HE HAS POTENTIAL!" indicates in one polite way or another the guy needs to step aside and you need to find that shining star that will carry you guys to the top.

Keep in touch with him, see how he's doing. Let him know you appreciated his efforts, but cut the ties as soon as possible.

Good luck.
 
my thoughts about singing...
it's 80% having the nuts to get up and do it (or being nuts, one of the 2)
10%...talent/actually being able to sing
10%...SELLING that you can sing and have the talent.

That being said...I listened to the live recording (not the entire passage/song, but enough). I can hear a very Tom Petty-esque
quality in his voice and with the right guidence he could pull it off, his stage presence is something is not quite the 10% of being able to sell it (from what I've seen, he's about 3-4% there, talent 6-7% imo). This is a person that is talented, and knows it, but hasn't had the guidence to harness it and use their ability to it's fullest extent. Personally if I were in your position, I would encourage him to either take lessons, or work with him...as you practice on your bass, guitar (pitched instrument)..have him sing the notes you play, in pitch and in time with you. (just a thought, but I wouldn't give up on him just yet.)
 
That's what I'm saying. People don't give a rat's ass if you have an unpleasant voice. Some will but plenty won't. All they care about is you moving them when you sing. And David Lee Roth, for as bad as he can sound live and as tired of hearing the old Van Halen stuff I might be, moves me when I hear him sing in a way that Sammy doesn't, even though Sammy's clearly the better singer. But Sammy has his fans and that's cool, too.

LOL ! You're kidding me, right ? You think this guy has any of the qualities of the famous singers you've brought up ? Name one besides singing in a band .
 
I would never ask anyone on Talkbass about their opinions on band management matters, and this thread is exactly why. Everyone says "fire them" no matter what the question is, like they're some big-time geniuses themselves. Hate to break it to you guys, but I have heard singers who sound awesome on their multi-million selling recordings sound out of tune and shaky in front of thousands live. Perry Farrell, Anthony Kiedis, Axl Rose, Brian Johnson, Steven Tyler (though he got better once he got off drugs)...and that's just off the top of my head.

I didn't think he sounded all that bad. Yeah, there are some problem spots, but big deal...a lot of you bass players screaming for his head probably make mistakes, too. I say suggest he get himself under a little better control, maybe take some vocal lessons, maybe see if he can deal without painkillers, which are meant to be a temporary solution and not a way of life. But I don't think he needs to be fired.

OTOH, I would consider anyone in my band who posted a thread like this about me to have committed a major act of betrayal, and I can guarantee you it would end up a "him or me" ultimatum if that were me being held up to ridicule by this bunch of bloodthirsty yet clueless internet animals.

You're fired.
 
my thoughts about singing...
it's 80% having the nuts to get up and do it (or being nuts, one of the 2)
10%...talent/actually being able to sing
10%...SELLING that you can sing and have the talent.

That being said...I listened to the live recording (not the entire passage/song, but enough). I can hear a very Tom Petty-esque
quality in his voice and with the right guidence he could pull it off, his stage presence is something is not quite the 10% of being able to sell it (from what I've seen, he's about 3-4% there, talent 6-7% imo). This is a person that is talented, and knows it, but hasn't had the guidence to harness it and use their ability to it's fullest extent. Personally if I were in your position, I would encourage him to either take lessons, or work with him...as you practice on your bass, guitar (pitched instrument)..have him sing the notes you play, in pitch and in time with you. (just a thought, but I wouldn't give up on him just yet.)

LOL ! I'm only laughing at your percentages. I wish , believe me . I wish. The second part should be done before a dismissal.
 
The audio in the youtube vid was not very well recorded overall. The bass had too much mids and needed more in the 1khz and 150hz areas.

But the singer sounded like he was trying to sound loud without turning up the mixer volume, probably trying to avoid feedback. This is maybe due to that he's singing out of his key range. He must find his key range it's where he'll feel comfortable in.