TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
P-Basses and Jazz basses are fine, but in terms of visual design they're so ubiquitous that I'd almost be embarrassed to be seen with either of them...
I'm superficial like that.
I thought I was the only one. I like odd-shaped basses with obnoxious paint jobs, so of course I own oddballs like the plastic-bodied Ibanez Ergodynes. However, I also have 3 cheap P copies that would probably horrify some folks around here. First, I converted them all to 5-string. I painted one sparkly purple and put a metal pick guard with a target sticker on it (yes, I use it for metal!) and covered the second with railroad-themed stickers. The third bass has a custom spalted maple neck, aftermarket clear pick guard, and skull sticker. My fourth P has been restrung BEAD, but I left everything else alone because the factory paint job is screaming neon pink.
I'm sorry - how many more dumb P bass threads need to be started this week? It's oversaturation.
So you decided to bump this one because.....?
It's funny how much pressure there can be to conform to the cult of Precision. I have nothing against P basses, I just don't think they're any more special than any number of other basses on the market. A lot of folks love their Ps and that's great - we should all be lucky enough to play what we most enjoy playing - but it seems as if many of those people take things a step further and seek to impose their taste on others. What I find funny (and annoying) is when non bassists who probably couldn't even tell a P from a Jazz in a blinfold test try to tell me that I should be playing a Precision. I'm convinced that for a lot of Peetotalers it has nothing to do with the sound - it's strictly a matter of history, a sense of safety and subscribing to some kind of trend that links the Precision with "authenticity" or some other such nonsense. It's silly.
P-Basses don't alter your brain. They alter your chest, right where they hit you when you play one through a big ol' loudbox.
It's funny though because, to me, the early use of the Precision doesn't elevate the status of the bass at all. It was one of very few options so of course it was used a lot back in the day. If there had been as many options then as there are now then the use of the P in recordings early on would say a lot more to me about how great the Precision is. As it stands I see it as one good option amongst many.Also, the history of the P-bass can't be ignored. It was the first electric to become popular, it was used on a bajillion recordings, it is still hugely popular today. That says a lot. Does it need to be stated over and over? Not necessarily, but there's plenty of redundancy here in many different topics....
It's funny how much pressure there can be to conform to the cult of Precision. I have nothing against P basses, I just don't think they're any more special than any number of other basses on the market. A lot of folks love their Ps and that's great - we should all be lucky enough to play what we most enjoy playing - but it seems as if many of those people take things a step further and seek to impose their taste on others. What I find funny (and annoying) is when non bassists who probably couldn't even tell a P from a Jazz in a blinfold test try to tell me that I should be playing a Precision. I'm convinced that for a lot of Peetotalers it has nothing to do with the sound - it's strictly a matter of history, a sense of safety and subscribing to some kind of trend that links the Precision with "authenticity" or some other such nonsense. It's silly.
Peetotalers
The cool thing is that TB is only representative of a small segment of actual players