• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Is this a good idea?

I have pretty much all that you've listed. MXR M-80, MXR M81, B7K, and a Sansamp RBI rack unit.
I'll try to keep this short, I know I tend to ramble, but it might help you with the rabbit trail I went down similar to this.

I started out looking for drive and grit. Had a Boss ME-50B, didn't like the distortions/OD on it.
Got a Sansamp Bddi (3 program pedal). Totally dug the tone of the Sansamp, it really gave me what I was looking for. On a whim to try new things, I got the MXR M80 distortion pedal. It's got 2 channels, one is Effect, and the other is the distortion. You can turn the gain down really low on the distortion side to make it give a small amount of grit, and have two useful channels.
The Distortion on the MXR M80 is more of a love/hate thing. I find it to be VERY aggressive and not really what I was looking for. In a band setting, I found that it didn't cut through the mix.

What I did like on the MXR M-80 was the clean effect with the "Color" option. It really makes it sound awesome. So I found out that MXR recently came out with the M-81, I figured it was like having the MXR M-80's "Effect" channel all in a controllable pedal, with complete control of the mids. After about an hour of tinkering with both pedals, I realized that the "Color" option on the M-80 is a scoop. I was able to replicate the M-80's sound through the M-81 by boosting the lows and highs and cutting the mids. Sounds great, but live, it'll just drain me out of the mix.
So I completely ditched the M-80, and switched over to the M-81. I use the M-81 not as a tone shaper, but more of a volume/bass control. When my guitarists are soloing or
I have pretty much all that you've listed. MXR M-80, MXR M81, B7K, and a Sansamp RBI rack unit.
I'll try to keep this short, I know I tend to ramble, but it might help you with the rabbit trail I went down similar to this.

I started out looking for drive and grit. Had a Boss ME-50B, didn't like the distortions/OD on it.
Got a Sansamp Bddi (3 program pedal). Totally dug the tone of the Sansamp, it really gave me what I was looking for. On a whim to try new things, I got the MXR M80 distortion pedal. It's got 2 channels, one is Effect, and the other is the distortion. You can turn the gain down really low on the distortion side to make it give a small amount of grit, and have two useful channels.
The Distortion on the MXR M80 is more of a love/hate thing. I find it to be VERY aggressive and not really what I was looking for. In a band setting, I found that it didn't cut through the mix.

What I did like on the MXR M-80 was the clean effect with the "Color" option. It really makes it sound awesome. So I found out that MXR recently came out with the M-81, I figured it was like having the MXR M-80's "Effect" channel all in a controllable pedal, with complete control of the mids. After about an hour of tinkering with both pedals, I realized that the "Color" option on the M-80 is a scoop. I was able to replicate the M-80's sound through the M-81 by boosting the lows and highs and cutting the mids. Sounds great, but live, it'll just drain me out of the mix.
So I completely ditched the M-80, and switched over to the M-81. I use the M-81 not as a tone shaper, but more of a volume/bass control. When my guitarists are soloing or when there's a clean part in our songs, I sometimes find that I'm a little too boomy and up front in the mix in our jam room. So I set the M-81 to drop the bass a little, and lower my output to where I sit in better with the rest of the band.


My currently tone is a B7K that's always on so that I can sculpt the EQ, and then I run the blend @ 2 oclock, and the drive down at 9 oclock. that is pretty much my tone 95% of the time. On songs where I can run the drive high for the whole song, I up the drive and lower the level a little to keep it balanced. On songs where I keep the B7K's drive low, but I need to add drive mid song, I have a Darkglass VMT with heavy drive and heavy blend. Stacked, the two work well. But I'm going to probably replace it with a B3K.

One thing I will say about the Sansamp line, if you get the BDDi or something else, you're only going to get a bass and treble control. I got the RBI rack unit because it's got a mid control, which I boost. So be weary of that. I think to boost the mids on the other pedals you're supposed to cut the bass and treble and it'll bring the mids out. I was using the Sansamp Rbi with my B7K on a lot, but I've found that I can run just the B7K and my tone cuts through a little better since the Sansamp has a little bit of a natural scoop to it.
I also have a vid online going through the pedals. It's kind of long winded, but I intend on cleaning it up and having a better presentation of the pedals. I haven't removed it yet, but I probably will once I have a better plan on how to document it and put it into a nice concise informative video.

My opinion, I'd highly suggest going with a B7K. You can get the eq the way that you want it, and get some awesome drive out of it. The blend and level controls on the B#K work a bit differently than most pedals and give you a lot of options to sculpt a tone you're looking for.


Thank you for your comprehensive reply. You were definitely in the same boat that I now find myself in. I will listen to your video when my wife goes to bed. If I plump for the b7k I will still need a separate pedal so that I can switch sounds mid song. I have come across a programmable vt bass that does also have a mid control. I'm not sure if it has a XLR out though. This one box could be my solution, but I will have to hunt down some sound clips and do some more research.
 
I like just a direct box on my bass to the board, or a line out pre-eq from my monitor amplifier, but then again I rarely use effects. I have always been a fan of the Bass POD if I needed an amplifier/speaker emulation, which it has many, plus effects, plus a tuner, plus the best "stompbox" compressor, plus midi, etc. I have ever used.
I currently have the line 6 pod x3 live which I use straight to the mixing desk. I do not use an amplifier, I just use the monitors that the house provide or sometimes we take our own. I find the x3 too much of a pain to tweak settings and set up patches. There are too many things that I don't need and I'm trying to simplify my setup.
 
Thank you for your comprehensive reply. You were definitely in the same boat that I now find myself in. I will listen to your video when my wife goes to bed. If I plump for the b7k I will still need a separate pedal so that I can switch sounds mid song. I have come across a programmable vt bass that does also have a mid control. I'm not sure if it has a XLR out though. This one box could be my solution, but I will have to hunt down some sound clips and do some more research.

If you notice, I keep the M-81 at the end of my chain. It's what I DI from to the FOH. So even though I don't use it for tone it still gets used for overall output control. I was going a full Rack setup and it was simple. Bass->Sansamp RBI->GK 1001RBii. When I found the B7K I started using it as my "always on" tone and I started to move all of my rack stuff to pedals. I'd totally put a Sansamp on the floor, but the fact that the RBI has a mid control makes me want to keep it for the control I use the most (considering that the B7K has 2 mid EQ controls).
Darkglass is aware of people wanting a 2 channel version of their pedal, so it's possibly in the works.
 
I currently have the line 6 pod x3 live which I use straight to the mixing desk. I do not use an amplifier, I just use the monitors that the house provide or sometimes we take our own. I find the x3 too much of a pain to tweak settings and set up patches. There are too many things that I don't need and I'm trying to simplify my setup.
I used a POD 2.0 when I played more guitar some years ago. It could not be more simple: the knobs emulated standard pre, treble, middle, bass, post, fx. I simply rotated the left rotary switch to the amp emulation I needed (usually blackface, occasionally Marshall, rarely anything else), hit the tuner button to tune, hit it again to go live, and everything was good to go. I didn't need to do much experimenting with the programming capability, either, but it was there if I needed it, including the right rotary to get the effect, which was usually just a touch of either reverb, chorus or compression - easier and more reliable than a stompbox.
 
If you notice, I keep the M-81 at the end of my chain. It's what I DI from to the FOH. So even though I don't use it for tone it still gets used for overall output control. I was going a full Rack setup and it was simple. Bass->Sansamp RBI->GK 1001RBii. When I found the B7K I started using it as my "always on" tone and I started to move all of my rack stuff to pedals. I'd totally put a Sansamp on the floor, but the fact that the RBI has a mid control makes me want to keep it for the control I use the most (considering that the B7K has 2 mid EQ controls).
Darkglass is aware of people wanting a 2 channel version of their pedal, so it's possibly in the works.
That b7k sounds really good! I like the way that the sansamp seems to tighten everything up a bit and enhances the sound. Thanks for posting your vid.
 
I currently use a multi effects pedal. It does a lot more than I need it too and it is a bit of an effort to programme. I don't use an amp and cab setup on gigs. I just DI from my pedal straight into the board. I was thinking of ditching the mfx unit, getting a sansamp BDDI to shape my clean sound and adding a B3k for my distorted sound. I would also run these straight to the board? Would this work? Are there any better/ alternative solutions?

It would work fine.

But what I would do is get a B7k and a dirt pedal. I hate the dirt on the Sansamp and so if you add the DI part to the B3k plus am EQ you get a better Di/preamp/distortion pedal than the sansamp. And then add a different dirt pedal for a different flavor - say - Fairfield Barbershop, Bearfoot Blueberry, Darkglass VMT, etc
 
Id get the B7K. That way you can skip the BDDI and the B3K! haha. Or get the B7K and 3. I used the BDDI for years, it did me well. But it was sold the same week I got the B7K. But yes, your initial post/idea will work out great too IMO.

I agree with gregmon79, You'd be better off saving your cash for a darkglass b7k. it's a distortion pedal and di both in one pedal. it may be pricey, but it's worth the investment for having a preamp pedal that adds dirt to your sound. here's a clip of the b7k.

 
  • Like
Reactions: gregmon79
Man that new Ampeg SCR DI looks realllllllllllll interesting...Can't wait to hear what folks have to say that have put it through the ringer...Looking forward to Tom Bowlus' and Jimmy M's take on it, at some point...I'm trying to hold myself off, but...I 'got some cash burnin' holes through my pockets pointing me in that "pre-order" direction...GAS'ers ANONYMOUS...