• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Issues with the Fender Ultra Jazz 5

I've tried both, own two Elite's and have set up several Ultras. I don't find one more difficult than the other. I'm actually not a fan of how Fender implemented the wheel compare to other versions. It's not that easy to find a tool that will fit the wheel. Additionally, most wheels will allow the tool to pass all the way through to provide more leverage which is a much better design. I've seen several Elite truss rod wheels damaged because the tool slipped. It didn't cause any issues, just cosmetic.
I understand your point. I don't have a problem with the lack of pass-through on the wheel, but I see how it could be an issue.
 
I read thru this whole thread and I am very perplexed to say the least! The 2 issues under discussion (misalignment of string to pole pieces and position of outer strings to edge of fingerboard) are so basic (and so crucial) to a successful guitar design. We all know that designing a new instrument goes thru a whole host of stages, including someone actually playing a prototype before it's finalized and manufacture starts. I would understand and would expect to see this from a cheapo bass, but you're going to use words like "ultra" and "elite" and "professional" in the name? That Fender did not pick up on these issues is not to be believed. As we used to say back in the day: don't p#ss down my back and tell me it's raining."

(I should point out that I am very happy with my 2019 American professional jazz 5. It's a very good bass.)
 
I understand your point. I don't have a problem with the lack of pass-through on the wheel, but I see how it could be an issue.

I have bent more than one drill bit trying to turn the truss rod wheel on the Elite because there was insufficient leverage. This design flaw would have been solved with a "pass through" wheel design. I ended up removing the neck so I could get TWO screwdrivers going into the wheel at opposite sides in order to turn the wheel. (It didn't turn very easily) This issue combined with the Ultra bridge disaster means (for me) that Fender USA Five string basses are utterly unqualified as contenders in that product category. Sad to see Fender has gotten so expert at shooting themselves in the foot.
 
Because the J is the J and the D is the D. It would be a big mistake to blur the product lines... especially the ones with the long history and fairly consistent pedigree (P, J).
I don't even have any idea if the Dimension 5 and any Jazz Bass 5 string necks are relative. It would make sense to keep some parts streamlined but hey, I'm (we're) on the outside looking in.
 
Wow, all the snapping on the wheel. I personally found the wheel easier to adjust, and I've never bent anything adjusting it. Seems I've always been able to find an allen key or screwdriver shaft to fit it and easily adjust it. With the allen key tool the bass ships with, yeah, the ultra is easy, but I don't normally have that tool with me, whereas I almost always have something that'll fit the wheel.

To each their own, I guess.
 
Welcome to my world. And, this is not a new problem for Fender.

A couple years ago I picked up a Fender Dimension V HH in a trade. Same problem, that Badass look-alike bridge was out of alignment, AND, the string height adjustment on the G string was on the deck (all the way down, no more further downward adjustment possible)

Since I build, modify and work on basses, I had a couple of Hipshot bridges in my inventory, and used a 18 mm Hipshot A style bridge and some wood veneer (used as a shim to raise the neck height)

Installed the bridge, installed the shim and everything was well within acceptable tolerance. Fast forward to a week ago, I picked up another Fender Dimension V-H on the super cheap (could not resist) and it had the EXACT SAME ISSUE. I repeated the same solution and the bass is well within tolerance now. (This is a 2013 bass)

The Hipshot A style 18mm has a three screw mounting pattern. The stock Fender BadAss knock-off bridge is a 4 screw mounting pattern, in different locations, so new holes needed to be drilled for this modification.

I would advise against any Fender bass that uses that Badass bridge knockoff. The base plate is thicker and the strings are higher off the body compared to either a Hipshot, or Fender high mass bridge (which I am a fan of) . The BadAss bridge knock off lacks any lateral adjustment as well, so you are stuck with whatever the factory does in the way of installation.

It's unfortunate that quite a few bass players are not more knowledgable or even aware of these design flaws, and buy these instruments anyway. How and why Fender released this version the "Ultra" with the same design flaws is a mystery. I contacted Fender quite some time ago about this issue. Perhaps these decisions are made in a board room, far from the R&D department.

Bridge replacement cost $100-$159 range. Labor charge would be $75.00-$125.00
Fender has been particularly capricious with their 5 string bass designs, changing their specs like different clothes each day; it would seem.

My Fender 5 is a parts instrument, using a 2007 J Deluxe neck and a 2014 J Deluxe body. Pat Wilkins had to rout the neck pocket to accommodate the 22 fret '07 neck for me.

This bass has the HipShot A Fender replacement bridge. Not sure how many different screw config Fender has for the bridge; but this one went right on to the '07 body like it was made for it. No fuss no muss, no shimming required; and it even preserves the string through capability, even though I will NEVER use it. LOL. I vastly prefer the HipShot bridge to the Fender BA bridge, which it replaced.

With the Sadowsky preamp and Delano pickups, this is my perfecto 5 string Jazz Bass.
F31CF6FB-6481-4F7E-8D06-6E75F43D0B30.jpeg
 
Fender has been particularly capricious with their 5 string bass designs, changing their specs like different clothes each day; it would seem.

My Fender 5 is a parts instrument, using a 2007 J Deluxe neck and a 2014 J Deluxe body. Pat Wilkins had to rout the neck pocket to accommodate the 22 fret '07 neck for me.

This bass has the HipShot A Fender replacement bridge. Not sure how many different screw config Fender has for the bridge; but this one went right on to the '07 body like it was made for it. No fuss no muss, no shimming required; and it even preserves the string through capability, even though I will NEVER use it. LOL. I vastly prefer the HipShot bridge to the Fender BA bridge, which it replaced.

With the Sadowsky preamp and Delano pickups, this is my perfecto 5 string Jazz Bass.
View attachment 4231332

Wow what a cool project and great result. Wish I kept every 04-07 Deluxe V I ever sold. Oh well. Agreed on the Hipshot bridge. I believe it's the "FM-3" model that Hipshot makes that is a direct bolt on. By the way, I settled on the aluminum version of the A style, it has great "snap" .
 
  • Like
Reactions: bucephylus
It's not a hate campaign in any case. Fender have made some great basses over the years, and Leo basically invented the electric bass guitar which is the reason were all mostly here.

The simple fact is the Fender company today has nothing to do with Leo or any of that history of quality, attention to detail and respect for individual musicians. They're a shady multinational who want to screw you every which way they can, and if that includes selling a bass they know to be defective because they know people will pay $2k for it, they'll do that too.

It isn't about hate, it's just highlighting the simple fact that the people running Fender atm aren't very nice people.
if the bass ain't cutting it for you then take it back to the store, especially when you're paying that type of coin for one of these things..
 
This thread made me aware of this design problems with the Ultra 5's back in 2019, has Fender done anything to rectify these issues? Just curious as one of my students just bought one of the Ultra 5's. His and 2 other Ultra 5's at the store where I teach have the the G string issue being to close to the edge of the fretboard, these are all basses I personally laid hands on. It's a shame cause his is a killer bass otherwise! My student's Ultra was a lil neck heavy, but other than that it was killin! It's a shame they didn't catch the issue, I'm guessing most of the Ultra 5's in the initial run all have this issue. Fender has almost caught back up with the boutiques on quality, fit and finish (at least with the Ultra), but these quality control issues bring the brand down. I also find it very frustrating that Fender is selling all kinds of killer jazz and p aftermarket pickups, however you can only get 4 string pups, 5 string pups are no longer offered, even thru a dealer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wizard65
This thread made me aware of this design problems with the Ultra 5's back in 2019...
To be fair, this wasn't a design problem. It was a production problem.

...has Fender done anything to rectify these issues? Just curious as one of my students just bought one of the Ultra 5's....
As I understand, all he has to do is contact Fender, and they'll take care of it. I'm pretty sure the fix is simply to swap out the bridge for the correct one.
 
I'm not a fan of the Fender American Ultra bridge for many reasons. IMO, the bridge used on Deluxe's and Elite's was their very best, now the bridge is called the American Professional Bridge and used on those basses and Mod Shop builds respectively. Not a fan of the Modern D neck profile either, even with the rolled edges it still has too much shoulder. Love the Modern C, Fast C (1963 Slim C), Asymmetrical, and C.
 
I'm not a fan of the Fender American Ultra bridge for many reasons. IMO, the bridge used on Deluxe's and Elite's was their very best, now the bridge is called the American Professional Bridge and used on those basses and Mod Shop builds respectively. Not a fan of the Modern D neck profile either, even with the rolled edges it still has too much shoulder. Love the Modern C, Fast C (1963 Slim C), Asymmetrical, and C.

I agree on the Deluxe...that was Fender's best. People that complained about the pickups/preamp just sucked at eq'ing, imo. I tried a new natural ash one years ago at GC, and it slammed...low action almost to the deck, and the sound was nasty.
 
I agree on the Deluxe...that was Fender's best. People that complained about the pickups/preamp just sucked at eq'ing, imo. I tried a new natural ash one years ago at GC, and it slammed...low action almost to the deck, and the sound was nasty.
Yes…. I own a 2013 Fender American Deluxe Jazz Natural Ash w/ maple fretboard. It's the best Fender Jazz I've ever owned. All the old school vibe, but with modern appointments. My Jazz plays like butter. Crazy low action, lots of sustain, the ergonomics feel great, and of course the crystal clear N3 pickups. I'm not sure Fender will ever top the 2013 - 2015 American Deluxe design.
 
Yes…. I own a 2013 Fender American Deluxe Jazz Natural Ash w/ maple fretboard. It's the best Fender Jazz I've ever owned. All the old school vibe, but with modern appointments. My Jazz plays like butter. Crazy low action, lots of sustain, the ergonomics feel great, and of course the crystal clear N3 pickups. I'm not sure Fender will ever top the 2013 - 2015 American Deluxe design.
Also the Elites, the last high end model using that same bridge before the Ultras came along and put those hi-mass bridges on.

i don't necessarily hate the hi-mass, but i do like the deluxe/elite better from both a looks as well as function standpoint.
 
I just got one and am returning it. I'm wondering if this is related to the issue I was having with both B and D strings touching the pickup pole pieces when playing anything harder than moderate. The action wasn't even that low and the height seemed ok. I'm wondering if this is related…