• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

It Ain't Pretty, But It Sounds Really Good!

I would play it. It is so ugly it's cool. And it has some serious BALLS!!

You should hear the Artist version of the same bass then...very unique sounding and polarizing instruments, then and now. And I have yet to play one that is not a direct competitor to T40 weight-wise. All of that being said, I didn't care for them when they were new, but wouldn't mind owning one nowadays.
 
Last edited:
It somehow reminds me of a 1950 Studebaker. go figure.

39004041455_1506990dd7.jpg
1950Studebaker-2dr-055 by TOM STRAIGHT, on Flickr
 
Well, its an OK bass I guess. I think the look of it is cool...I'll give it that. But just not impressed with the tones he had---maybe the amp, whatever. Overall, within the EQ he was playing, to me it sounded much better with fingers than with a pick (I think I heard the famous Gibson mud creeping in with a pick surprisingly), even tho both methods still underwhelming. And for me, a bass MUST sound good with fingers and good with pick or its a no-go.
My opinion:
1. OK for bar work
2. OK until you get a better bass
3. YMMV