• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

LAKLAND OWNERS GROUP #50!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The trans brown over mahogany looked good when I had it, but sparkle will look better IMO.

So glad we traded Markus! The gold is definitely more ME.
 

Attachments

  • image-3691811967.jpg
    image-3691811967.jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 55
congrats!!!

slapping huh?

I would like to learn myself...

Yeah, I figured it was time to learn. I find it tough as hell, though.

Finally managed to get my hands on a 55-02 and it was awesome! It would complement my jazz bass VERY nicely. It's likely that one of those will be my next bass though that might not be for a while.

You're bound to really like it. Especially once you get into flipping the DIP switches to find the mids sweet spot for your playing.
 
Finally managed to get my hands on a 55-02 and it was awesome! It would complement my jazz bass VERY nicely. It's likely that one of those will be my next bass though that might not be for a while.

Yes. It will. Your comments in the other thread were right on. It's similar enough, yet can be different with the flip of a switch. I don't keep tonal duplicates in my stable, but I do have a 55-60 and a 55-94 that each have their songs.
 
I understand I understand..
That's why there's the dunn and the glaub. The '51 is very redundant as a skyline with the split. I know the dimensions are a little different, but they should've gone all the way with it and done the single. I think anyone who would be into the aesthetics of the 51 would've been into the single. Everyone else will get a glaub or dunn.

Just my two cents as I was very excited for a '51 skyline. I definitely would've picked one up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts