Measured mine too - exact 60s jazz positioning scaled up for the 35inch scale …I measured my 55-94
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Measured mine too - exact 60s jazz positioning scaled up for the 35inch scale …I measured my 55-94
Some random thoughts/questions about the 2007 Skyline 44-02 I just got.
3. I was under the impression that the MM pickup was situated so that when split, the rear pickup was in the Jazz 70s position and the front rear pickup was in the 60's position. But when comparing it to my DJ-4 and 44-64 PJ, the rear split pickups all line up.
if anyone has any thoughts or can confirm, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
Yes, that is exactly it! I changed both pups and pre in mine. It was good before the mods, but now it is exceptional. I know that's not what you are looking for, but that's the case for many 44-01's.It's historically been the platform for mods. As the least expensive model.
I can tell you from experience that the pickups are "just ok" for my taste. You can find better sounding soap bars. But the preamp is the thing that most people want to change.
You may find the stock instrument to your liking. I did not. As always, YMMV.
Couldn't you just email lakland about your bass? They answered some detailed questions about a used skyline I have.Hi guys.
Can someone maybe tell me if a Lakland U.S.A. Bob Glaub from 2008 was already built with graphite reinforced necks?
Serial Number says BG 336.
Greetings from Germany,
Michael
Couldn't you just email lakland about your bass? They answered some detailed questions about a used skyline I have.
Hi guys.
Can someone maybe tell me if a Lakland U.S.A. Bob Glaub from 2008 was already built with graphite reinforced necks?
Serial Number says BG 336.
Greetings from Germany,
Michael
Great office shot!Posted in the Bergantino thread as well, but I played a gig Saturday after a LONG time off, my '99 55-94 was a joy to play and sounded great (and didn't kill my shoulder < 9lbs). Got down to the low C and it sounded (and felt) great.
View attachment 4901334


It's a nice looking bass! Love the knobs as well.I got a 44-01 today and I have to say, I'm really surprised at Chicago Music Exchange. The Ad on Reverb called the below "blocks"...
View attachment 4901901
...and being my first Lakland, I bit. Wasn't until a fellow TBer pointed it out that I realized that you can see the dots through the stickers. I dug the look, and it was already purchased, so I decided to wait and see…
Well, it showed up today and it turns out that the supposed "blocks" looked like A$$, and a couple even had corners coming up! I spent two hours before plugging it in finger-nail-ing and scrubbing with lemon oil to get those stickers off, and now...
View attachment 4901912
You can see in the photo that I left some sticker scraps of fret 19 & 21
The knobs look pretty great though \_(",)_/
I got a 44-01 today and I have to say, I'm really surprised at Chicago Music Exchange. The Ad on Reverb called the below "blocks"...
View attachment 4901901
\_(",)_/
@Jon Draffan -- ...has the CME experience tainted the purchase? If it did, what's the return policy because you did purchase a bass with block markers. Perhaps block vs dot markers aren't a big deal to you...![]()
I'm a sucker for blocks. I secured a loan and bought the bass because of the blocks. I feel hoodwinked by this ad/sale.
Especially when they start all their listings with "The following specs were carefully collected and recorded by a skilled technician."It did absolutely taint the purchase. I looked again and this is the ad:View attachment 4901963
