• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Lawsuit" and "pre-lawsuit" instruments do not exist

dahliabunni-popcorn.gif
 
ChatGPT get many things wrong and state their errors with confidence.

It told me Les Pauls have 250k pots and strats 500k! Among other things.
Except it's not wrong in this case is it? Gibson vs. Elger Co. — filed June 28, 1977 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). It's a matter of public record.
 
I honestly hadn't predicted this kind of discussion. Kinda regret starting this thread. TBH I would be better if a mod would close it. Sorry people.
Every now and then, a "pre-lawsuit Ibanez" or a "lawsuit Greco" pops up on the various used web pages. I've always wondered when those lawsuits were, who filed them and how they ended. Surprise surprise, they never happened. Ever. No lawsuit over the Fender or Gibson designs has been filed against the Japanese manufacturers, nothing was ever settled in or out of a court of law. So. Please stop using those terms. They are wrong.

Well, you did ask people to change their verbiage, and folks tend to not like that so much.

Also, whether or not the lawsuit(s) happened, that terminology is pretty much part of the vernacular now.

That said, I learned something from this thread, so I think that's kinda cool, but it doesn't change how folks describe their instruments.
 
I would think that whatever happened or the legalities in place today, there are amazing straight-up copies like the ESP Navigators and others that are dead-perfect copies of the electric classics that are very common in Japan and elsewhere in the Far East that will never be marketed here by their makers. The reasons would seem obvious.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow
Does the THREAT of legal action count as "Lawsuit Era", as in "The 70's were an Era of threatened and actual Lawsuits by multiple guitar companies". If AI searches can be believed, Ric actually did sue Lollar pickups in 2013 for infringing on their horseshoe pickup design, and they sure as hell at least threatened to pursue legal action against the various Japanese clones. This is one of those pointless TB discussions where no Nit is left Unpicked, like the Tools who respond to the statement "the sky is blue" by saying "No it isn't, your eyes just perceive it that way because all the other colors of the spectrum are absorbed or reflected", as if that wasn't true of EVERY named color. I'm going to keep calling them "Lawsuit Basses" (and the sky blue) as a convenient and commonly accepted piece of language, which is, after all, the random and entirely nonsensical hootings of tool-using Primates. I Win the Argument! Sue Me!
 
I think if you asked the average person if a 'cease and desist' letter from a company is a lawsuit, they'd probably agree because it's legal action. Technically it's different, but the result is the same, the copied designs were not brought into the US, and/or the designs were modified.

I've had a whole bunch of guitars and basses from this era and still have a LP Greco that my brother has on loan, and I've also had no trouble selling Greco and Ibanez Ric copies from this era, but I never mentioned Rickenbacker in the title or copy.
 
I think, of all the TB threads I’ve perused over the years, this one is the worst
You clearly have had ALOT of people on ignore fairly early. I've deleted all the ignores from my list a few times just to end up getting suspended a few times when I gave ANY sort of push back. Learned my lesson trying to "discuss" anything with "gold" members on this forum. I just ignore right from the jump now, makes browsing and enjoying the site a much better experience IMO, quite a few rage baiters perusing this forum and when you burn them they go straight to the mods.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts