Joe kudos that u know your scales, chord tones, chromaticis, etc. Now I'm going to tell u what the jazz greats will tell u. Forget 60 percent of that garbage u know. It's too much thinking. Know your chordal tones and move your phrasing with the chord changes. Knowing the chordal tones forces players to put chord tones on strong beats and everything else is acceptable on weak beats. I'm trying to help u see. Let me put it to u this way.
Most scale players see a chord like C major and think they have C D E F G A B open to them. The problem with most scale players is they don't know which is the chord tones. So over a C major chord they could play F note which will sound terrible over a strong beat and unless u resolve that quickly to a E or G note u are going to hear a minor 2nd clash. The other problem with most scale people is u run the risk of playing alllllll non chord tones over a measure. For example, playing only a D, F, A note over a C Chord. Scale people do this a lot because they have no concept of harmony. Again, seeing C D E F G A B for a chord is not the way to approach it. And I don't teach rote. Students learn to read notes and they learn chord tones.
Interesting reading you thinking and yes to a degree you get it right, but you get it wrong just as much, you use what is basic standard theory and try and sell it as of you are the only person that seem to understand it.......then this post.
You use the phrase "forget 60% of that garbage", so you have fallen into the modern idea that only the immediate relevant information is known, the other stuff does not matter.
What I, and other are saying, is you do not forget 60% of what you learned, you use 40% of what you learned. So if chord tones and such is 100% of what you know, what have you in reserve to expand on....... It seem myself and other have another 60% to fall back on where you may have nothing???
You use words that mean the same thing, you apply what you consider to be the meaning of what you understand, you have gaps because of you use the advice you give out........and using your own words, I estimates you may have about 60% worth of gaps spread over what you think and know.
For example, "chord tone arpeggios are not scales" well chord tones are arpeggios. I know you will labour the point using the limited definitions you know and say they are not, but really they are.
Why do we have triads and arpeggios?.......surely a triad is just an arpeggio with on note taken away in your thinking?
What about Pentatonic's, surely they are just chord tones with an added note in your thinking.....or are they better viewed as a scale with two notes omitted, and if it is called a Pentatonic scale, then yes, chord tone arpeggios as you call them.....are scales.
So what are scales.....not in music, but in definition and why is the word used in music?
Scale, the definition that music uses it for, ratio of distance. That use added a new definition, a sequenced set of notes.
That is the distance between notes, tones, or intervals.....the word scale is not what matters.
You talk about passing note, so if passing notes are not an chord tones, then what are they and how do you learn about their use?
You seem to want to use all the notes of a scale without calling it a scale.
If a climber asked me to scale a wall, I would never asume he wants notes for it. The same as if I was asked to remove the scales from a fish, I would not expect to remove notes, or if I was asked what scale the map I was reading from, I would not be looking for notes to form a key.....and so on, the word scale is not an issue.
Good luck with what you do, and if it works for you fair enough, but if you teach, teach them everything and let the student decide what they want to use.
