I'm 5.6 all so but I like my 35"I'm only 5'6" so having a bass that's huge is just uncomfortable for me.
My shorts are all comfortable for my vertically challenged stature.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I'm 5.6 all so but I like my 35"I'm only 5'6" so having a bass that's huge is just uncomfortable for me.
My shorts are all comfortable for my vertically challenged stature.
I am 6 ft and have large hands with gnarly fingers. (Fingers mostly due to arthritis.)I always thought short scale was for beginners or people with small fingers, but now I find out that Stanley Clark's Alembic was a short scale and there are a number of high end short scale basses out there that sound very good. So what is the advantages of each and why choose a short scale over a long scale?
I always thought short scale was for beginners or people with small fingers, but now I find out that Stanley Clark's Alembic was a short scale and there are a number of high end short scale basses out there that sound very good. So what is the advantages of each and why choose a short scale over a long scale?
I always thought short scale was for beginners or people with small fingers, but now I find out that Stanley Clark's Alembic was a short scale and there are a number of high end short scale basses out there that sound very good. So what is the advantages of each and why choose a short scale over a long scale?
There’s a much bigger variety, but these are the different scales I’ve personally played and am most familiar with.I always thought short scale was for beginners or people with small fingers, but now I find out that Stanley Clark's Alembic was a short scale and there are a number of high end short scale basses out there that sound very good. So what is the advantages of each and why choose a short scale over a long scale?
Quick and dirty answer: different feel, note response, and tone.
In reality it’s a bit more nuanced than that. But suffice to say most short-scale basses have a different vibe than long-scale basses.
But even that’s not completely true since the new short-scale basses have come a long way since the 60s. They can even work for slap if that’s your thing.
A good example of that is Scott Whitley winding out on Mark King’s famous song Mr. Pink. He’s using two short-scale Chowny basses - one with normal and the other with piccolo guage strings. Tell me if you think the lower tuned one sounds any different than…say a Fender JB?
Note: hand size has nothing to do with it. Many small handed players are perfectly comfortable playing 34” and 35” scale necks. And there’s also a good number of individuals with normal to large hands who play short-scale basses. Good bass technique is not dependent on the size or strength of your hands.
That's an amazing clip!
I play a shortscale Birdsong HY5 It is comfortable to play and sounds amazing. I am ordering a bass from Kiesel in October...it will be interesting to see how hard it will be to switch back again.I always thought short scale was for beginners or people with small fingers, but now I find out that Stanley Clark's Alembic was a short scale and there are a number of high end short scale basses out there that sound very good. So what is the advantages of each and why choose a short scale over a long scale?