I clearly stated that I found your use of the term amusing, not insulting to me. Let's get this out of the way. If I want to personally attack you, there won't be any tiptoeing around rules. I'll call you a cock-knocker, back it up with a bit of empirical evidence that involves both cocks and knocking, and be done with it. When that post shows up, feel free to say that I'm personally attacking you.
Until then, let's assume that I don't get worked up enough about most of this crap to get to the point of personally insulting anyone, with one exception I won't waste time here on.
Without putting words in your mouth, it seems as though you're saying it's OK to run with the stereotype of a subset of a race? More on this later.... Yes. Subset stereotyoes are fair game. Ya got that, Jews?
You must be tired carrying that grudge all the way from August.
Oddly, it's still applicable, so I guess your efforts weren't for naught. My point was simply that I find it fairly amusing that you would use a term that negatively refers to a cultural group. I still do.
Mike
No, no grudge. I merely find you thinking of me as "not being able to see the forest through the trees" amusing.
My key point is that although yes, most "guidos" are white (though I have met Asian and Hispanic versions of these types before, believe it or not), the "guido" stereotype is not race-based. It's making fun of the personality flaws (cockiness, chauvinistic, etc) of these particular people. The fact that they are a "subset" of white males is a moot point. Similarly, the "ricer" term has seemed to now include any guys who do those things to their cars and have an attitude problem to boot. My arguments against stereotypes called out media painting Asians with a broad brush, such as portraying ALL Asian males as either nerds, martial arts experts, or spineless losers.

