• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Mahogany or Koa?

I could be wrong, but I worked at Taylor for five years. I saw literally thousands of pieces of mahogany and hundreds of pieces of Koa. Especially the close up shots of the grain look like mahogany. I don't recall seeing Koa that porous.
 
I think you could order all mahogany as an option back in the late 1990's. The headstock overlay is different than the rest of the bass. Almost looks lighter than the rest of the bass.

ir7q81.jpg


jg4fpv.jpg


And here is one more closeup of the wood. These were taken from the auction photo's where I bought the bass. It is definitely in the 10 to 11 pound range.

fp5s88.jpg
 
It's very easy to look it up---Koa was the upgrade option for basses in 1997.

Koa was AN option, but so was mahogany.

Here's a good link to use when identifying Carvins: [Invalid or Expired Link Removed]

Note: Link fixed 7/27

The gold sheen in the flash pics are a quality of almost all the koa I've seen, and the grain looks like koa to me as well. I've seen lighter colored mahogany that looked similar, but I'd still say this looks like koa to me.

I would not, however, bet my house on it. :)
 
I'm happy with the bass either way. I was hoping it was Mahogany but when I got the bass I just could not really tell. A well made and beautiful bass in any case! Thanks for all the help and opinions guys!