• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Major Scale Box" diagram

I'm pretty new to bass, so keep that in mind with my question: Why would you choose to show the minor triad with such a long stretch between the 3rd and 5th, vs. the shape shown at the bottom below?

upload_2020-12-28_13-13-25.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12BitSlab
I am probably newer to bass than you are! That's a good question and I hope someone smarter than me can fact check my guess. The triad diagram is derived from the typical major scale sequence. Flattening a note in that sequence may just be easier to remember than other valid fingerings. (But why is that major scale pattern seemingly ubiquitous when you can play it other ways, that I don't know.)

My expectation is that you'd learn the other fingering you pointed out too, and pick whichever one was best based on the next thing you wanted to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spin Doctor
My expectation is that you'd learn the other fingering you pointed out too, and pick whichever one was best based on the next thing you wanted to play.
Yup. There's basically three different fingerings you can use to play any triad or seventh chord. Off of the first, second, or fourth finger. You should work on all of them. The fact that you recognize this so early on, and was able to make your chord chart tells me that you really get the big picture.
 
I am probably newer to bass than you are! That's a good question and I hope someone smarter than me can fact check my guess. The triad diagram is derived from the typical major scale sequence. Flattening a note in that sequence may just be easier to remember than other valid fingerings. (But why is that major scale pattern seemingly ubiquitous when you can play it other ways, that I don't know.)

My expectation is that you'd learn the other fingering you pointed out too, and pick whichever one was best based on the next thing you wanted to play.

Correct. We do learn all this in small leaps up to a new area, where we stay until a new leap takes us to another new area.

Trying to do it all at one time makes us give up and we quit.
 
I think everybody should spend time making there own diagrams, using the underlying rules for interval construction. diagrams form scales, individual intervals, triads, 7 note arpeggios. anything that has a name. Multiple diagrams for the same patterns. extended diagrams across serval octaves. Diagrams of the entire scale across the entire neck.

Just don't fall into the trap of thinking that knowing the shape = knowing the scale (or chord or whatever)
I often say there are 4 components to master before one can "know" a musical concept:
  • sound
  • execution
  • name
  • notation
The "box" diagram is just an aid to execution (and just one possible execution at that)

Further, something s foundational as the major scale contains patterns within patterns and relationships within relationships that are pretty endless. I learned the box 3 1/2 decades ago, and went around thinking I "knew the major scale" for a hot minute. Now 30+ years later, I know there's still work I need to do.